Re: [Standards] XML Element Ordering

2021-02-23 Thread Kevin Smith
On 23 Feb 2021, at 09:30, Dave Cridland wrote: > > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 19:02, Florian Schmaus > wrote: > On 2/18/21 12:16 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 19:22, Kevin Smith > > >

Re: [Standards] XML Element Ordering

2021-02-23 Thread Dave Cridland
On Mon, 22 Feb 2021 at 19:02, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 2/18/21 12:16 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 19:22, Kevin Smith > > wrote: > > > > On 17 Feb 2021, at 18:42, Florian Schmaus > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [Standards] XML Element Ordering

2021-02-22 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 2/18/21 12:16 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 at 19:22, Kevin Smith > wrote: On 17 Feb 2021, at 18:42, Florian Schmaus mailto:f...@geekplace.eu>> wrote: > > On 2/16/21 4:14 PM, Jonas Schäfer wrote: >> I think this is the best

Re: [Standards] XML Element Ordering

2021-02-17 Thread Dave Cridland
I think, broadly, that stanza contents can be re-serialized in any way that would not alter the canonicalized form, and not otherwise. So if you want to reorder attributes, go for it. Reorder elements, not so much. There are some obvious exceptions: Servers can insert new elements just fine and

Re: [Standards] XML Element Ordering

2021-02-17 Thread Kevin Smith
On 17 Feb 2021, at 18:42, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > On 2/16/21 4:14 PM, Jonas Schäfer wrote: >> I think this is the best place in the thread to reply with all my thoughts. >> Vote change to -0 (or +1 with additional fixes) instead of -1 inline. >> On Sonntag, 14. Februar 2021 21:12:17 CET

[Standards] XML Element Ordering

2021-02-17 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 2/16/21 4:14 PM, Jonas Schäfer wrote: I think this is the best place in the thread to reply with all my thoughts. Vote change to -0 (or +1 with additional fixes) instead of -1 inline. On Sonntag, 14. Februar 2021 21:12:17 CET Florian Schmaus wrote: Eventually, this is a situation where we