[Standards] Message Reactions vs XEP-0367 vs. XEP-0372

Hi Marvin, * Marvin W [2019-07-24 22:02]: > > Referencing messages I agree with all that you wrote about XEP-0372, and I suppose the only reason it gets referenced so often in these discussion is because it's inadequately titled "Message References". > On the contrary, XEP-0367 does not suffer

Re: [Standards] Council Voting Summary 2019-07-28

* Tedd Sterr [2019-07-29 03:16]: > Proposed XMPP Extension: Message Reactions - > https://xmpp.org/extensions/inbox/reactions.html > Dave: [pending] > Georg: +0 (for now; still undecided) > Jonas: +1 (details can be ironed out) > Kev: [pending] > Link: +1 (issues can be ironed out before Draft)

Re: [Standards] Council Voting Summary 2019-07-28

The only thing about it which makes me feel bad is using Emoji.Using User Mood element instead sounds much better for me.29.07.2019, 15:32, "Georg Lukas" :* Tedd Sterr [2019-07-29 03:16]: Proposed XMPP Extension: Message Reactions -

[Standards] Detecting an ended file transfer

Hi, for XEP-0234: Jingle File Transfer (https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0234.html), how is one supposed to detect the end of a file transfer? I currently see two methods: 1) The transport method has a way of closing the stream. This exists for IBB, via the `` element. It also exists for S5B,

Re: [Standards] Detecting an ended file transfer

> 1) The transport method has a way of closing the stream. This exists for > IBB, via the `` element. It also exists for S5B, via closing the > TCP connection. Potential race condition since signaling and media are flowing in different planes. You can’t be sure that the ‘done sending’ signal