Re: [Standards] XEP-0371 (Jingle ICE): update RFC 5245 -> RFC 8445

2020-03-12 Thread Jonathan Lennox
One major comment: 1. There is (and has always been) a semantic hole in ICE restart with Jingle, because transport-info is a unilateral message, unlike SDP offer/answer which is transactional. Specifically, there's no way for a Jingle endpoint to know for certain which generation of its local

[Standards] XEP-0371 (Jingle ICE): update RFC 5245 -> RFC 8445

2020-03-12 Thread Sergey Ilinykh
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/905 PR Changes: 1. RFC 5245 is replaced with RFC 8445 2. Aggressive nomination is not supported anymore 3. remote-candidate is now MUST to mimic ICE SDP RFC 4. Now remote-candidate has to be send for all components at once when ICE for media stream