Hi everyone,
As you may know, my employer (Pando) provides IM services (over XMPP, of
course) to various health services around the world, including the National
Health Service in the UK.
For some reason, things are quite busy at the moment...
https://hellopando.com/covid-19/
XSF work is,
>
> An interface switches addresses, so you send transport-info with
> generation X.
>
> The interface switches addresses back, so you then send transport-info with
> generation X+1.
>
> You receive transport-info with generation Y.
>
> Should you pair the generation Y candidates with generation
* Jonas Schäfer [2020-03-17 17:28]:
> - Are clients allowed to reply receipt requests when fetching messages from
> MAM? I think they are, despite the wording in the text (which IMO only
> considers the user browsing an archive), but I guess the wording needs
> cleaning up.
In my
On Dienstag, 3. März 2020 18:45:44 CET Jonas Schäfer wrote:
> The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0184 before
> presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
>
>
> During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
>
> 1. What software
Hi everyone,
The next XMPP Council Meeting will take place on 2020-03-18 at 16:00Z in
xmpp:coun...@muc.xmpp.org?join. Everyone is welcome to join and give comments.
This agenda is composed from:
- Editor notifications to standards@
- xsf/xeps GitHub PRs marked as Needs Council
- Suggestions
> who is implementing 8445?
>
> Firefox only implements aggressive nomination.
> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1034964 has some details.
Does it matter? Do you think the new standard is going to be abandoned?
Do you think XMPP should implement the standard only after other big
Am 12.03.20 um 22:30 schrieb Sergey Ilinykh:
https://github.com/xsf/xeps/pull/905
PR Changes:
1. RFC 5245 is replaced with RFC 8445
who is implementing 8445?
2. Aggressive nomination is not supported anymore
Firefox only implements aggressive nomination.
