Re: [Standards] XEP-0371 (Jingle ICE): update RFC 5245 -> RFC 8445

2020-03-19 Thread Sergey Ilinykh
> > > I'm still not sure if it solves the problem if one end sends two > "restart" > > transport-infos in rapid succession. It'll receive a "restart" > > transport-info > > in response, but which one should it pair it with? > > > > > > according to ufrag. > > > > so one end sends

[Standards] UPDATED: XEP-0167 (Jingle RTP Sessions)

2020-03-19 Thread pep
Version 1.1.2 of XEP-0167 (Jingle RTP Sessions) has been released. Abstract: This specification defines a Jingle application type for negotiating one or more sessions that use the Real-time Transport Protocol (RTP) to exchange media such as voice or video. The application type includes a

Re: [Standards] XEP-0371 (Jingle ICE): update RFC 5245 -> RFC 8445

2020-03-19 Thread Jonathan Lennox
On Wednesday, March 18 2020, "Sergey Ilinykh" wrote to "XMPP Standards" saying: > > I'm still not sure if it solves the problem if one end sends two "restart" > transport-infos in rapid succession.  It'll receive a "restart" > transport-info > in response, but which one should it