Re: [Standards] Council Minutes 2020-05-20

2020-05-25 Thread Georg Lukas
* Tedd Sterr [2020-05-22 23:56]: > 4a) Advance XEP-0339 (Source-Specific Media Attributes in Jingle) - > https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0339.html +1 > 4b) Advance XEP-0320 (Use of DTLS-SRTP in Jingle Sessions) - > https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0320.html +1 Greetings, Georg

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0393 (Message Styling)

2020-05-25 Thread Marvin W
Hi, On 25.05.20 15:29, goffi wrote: > > yes that's the idea. Not `styling=inline` because we don't use > namespaced attributes and thus I don't think we can add an to , > but something after the body like

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0393 (Message Styling)

2020-05-25 Thread goffi
Le 2020-05-25 15:01, Tedd Sterr a écrit : But there is no way to know if the text is formatted or not, there is no marker, discovery, or anything to indicate that styling syntax is used. The assumption is that styling is always present and enabled, and so it's always applied to all text -

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0393 (Message Styling)

2020-05-25 Thread Tedd Sterr
> But there is no way to know if the text is formatted or not, there is no > marker, discovery, or anything to indicate that styling syntax is used. The assumption is that styling is always present and enabled, and so it's always applied to all text - if there happens to be no styling directives

Re: [Standards] LAST CALL: XEP-0393 (Message Styling)

2020-05-25 Thread goffi
Hello, Le 2020-05-12 21:35, Jonas Schäfer a écrit : This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on XEP-0393. […] 1. Is this specification needed to fill gaps in the XMPP protocol stack or to clarify an existing protocol? no and yes. It was not necessary with XHTML-IM, but now