Re: [Standards] Call for Experience: XEP-0050: Ad-Hoc Commands

2020-05-27 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 5/26/20 10:24 PM, Tedd Sterr wrote: > It's worth noting "the execute issue" and considering a fix before > advancing. > > > From "Council Minutes 2018-04-18" - > https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2018-April/034790.html > > *3) XEP-0050 'execute' Issue* > … Kev explains that it's

Re: [Standards] Call for Experience: XEP-0050: Ad-Hoc Commands

2020-05-26 Thread Sergey Ilinykh
> The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0050 before > presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status. > > > During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions: > > 1. What software has XEP-0050 implemented? Please note that the > protocol must

Re: [Standards] Call for Experience: XEP-0050: Ad-Hoc Commands

2020-05-26 Thread Tedd Sterr
It's worth noting "the execute issue" and considering a fix before advancing. >From "Council Minutes 2018-04-18" - >https://mail.jabber.org/pipermail/standards/2018-April/034790.html 3) XEP-0050 'execute' Issue … Kev explains that it's possible to have an illegal state because 'execute' is

Re: [Standards] Call for Experience: XEP-0050: Ad-Hoc Commands

2020-05-26 Thread Jonas Schäfer
On Dienstag, 26. Mai 2020 17:40:08 CEST Jonas Schäfer wrote: > The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0050 before > presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status. > > > During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions: > > 1. What software

[Standards] Call for Experience: XEP-0050: Ad-Hoc Commands

2020-05-26 Thread XSF Editor
The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0050 before presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status. During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions: 1. What software has XEP-0050 implemented? Please note that the protocol must be