Old Thread Alert!!
On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 04:33, Travis Burtrum wrote:
> In practice, it doesn't matter, the server administrator can't actually
> count on anyone accessing any of the SRV records in any specific order
> because any network could have any types of blocks/constraints on it.
>
Am Di., 11. Feb. 2020 um 16:31 Uhr schrieb Jonas Schäfer :
>
> The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0368 before
> presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
>
>
> During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
>
> 1. What software
On 2/11/20 5:29 PM, Jonas Schäfer (XSF Editor) wrote:
> The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0368 before
> presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
>
> You can review the specification here:
>
> https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0368.html
>
> Please send
On Tue, 11 Feb 2020 at 16:30, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
> The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0368 before
> presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
>
>
> During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
>
> 1. What software has
On 2/11/20 11:29 AM, Jonas Schäfer (XSF Editor) wrote:
> 1. What software has XEP-0368 implemented? Please note that the
> protocol must be implemented in at least two separate codebases (at
> least one of which must be free or open-source software) in order to
> advance from Draft to Final.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020, at 11:29, Jonas Schäfer wrote:
> 1. What software has XEP-0368 implemented?
I have implemented this in my XMPP library which is used by several
small clients, bots, and notification services. The documentation for
the relevant package (and links to the source) can be found
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020, at 11:43, Philipp Hörist wrote:
> Mixing DIRECT and START TLS is problematic i guess its not supported
> by any library that offers some kind of abstraction over sockets.
>
> …
>
> This rule will most likely be ignored by clients.
I have run into this problem and would like
On Dienstag, 11. Februar 2020 17:29:47 CET Jonas Schäfer wrote:
> The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0368 before
> presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
>
>
> During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
>
> 1. What
>
> 1. What software has XEP-0368 implemented? Please note that the
> protocol must be implemented in at least two separate codebases (at
> least one of which must be free or open-source software) in order to
> advance from Draft to Final.
>
Gajim / nbxmpp
>
> 2. Have developers experienced any
The XEP Editor would like to Call for Experience with XEP-0368 before
presenting it to the Council for advancing it to Final status.
During the Call for Experience, please answer the following questions:
1. What software has XEP-0368 implemented? Please note that the
protocol must be
10 matches
Mail list logo
