It's been pointed out to me that this comes across combative, which isn't
the intention, and I apologise for that.
The crux of my argument here is in the phrase "there's no common behaviour
between Features and, say, a '198 ack".
Much of the aims of XEP-0360 appear to be based on a desire to
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 08:47, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>
> > In Section 5, business rule #2 states:
> >
> > "Nonzas SHOULD NOT have a 'from' or 'to' attribute."
> >
> > I have a few questions:
> >
> > - When is it sensible to make an exception to this SHOULD NOT?
>
> I can not think of one.
On Fri, 22 Mar 2024 at 08:47, Florian Schmaus wrote:
> For example, assume a XMPP library written in an object-oriented
> language. There is a superclass TopLevelStreamElement which has one
> obvious subclass named Stanza. Now, how should we name the other
> subclass?
Hi Florian,
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:47 AM Florian Schmaus wrote:
> Yes, Smack models Nonzas as language-level type and uses this type in
> its API. Among other things, this makes the API and implementation less
> error prone.
> For example, assume a XMPP library written in an
On 10/03/2024 16.18, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
> XEP-0360.
>
> Title: Nonzas (are not Stanzas)
> Abstract:
> This specification defines the term "Nonza", describing every top
> level stream element that is not a Stanza.
>
> URL:
I have similar views to Dave and Daniel on this.
This specification is not needed to fill any gaps in the protocol, it is
quite easy to refer to "non-stanza top-level elements" or "non-stanza
stream-level elements" without inventing a new word for them. We have
enough jargon floating around
On Sun, 10 Mar 2024 at 15:19, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
> XEP-0360.
>
> Title: Nonzas (are not Stanzas)
> Abstract:
> This specification defines the term "Nonza", describing every top
> level stream element that is not a Stanza.
>
>
On Montag, 11. März 2024 10:14:36 CET Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 4:18 PM Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> > This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
> > XEP-0360.
> > […]
> > Please consider the following questions during this Last Call and send
> > your feedback
-- Original Message --
From "Daniel Gultsch"
To standards@xmpp.org
Date 11/03/2024 09:14:36
Subject [Standards] Re: LAST CALL: XEP-0360 (Nonzas (are not Stanzas))
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 4:18 PM Daniel Gultsch wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call fo
On Sun, Mar 10, 2024 at 4:18 PM Daniel Gultsch wrote:
>
> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
> XEP-0360.
>
> Title: Nonzas (are not Stanzas)
> Abstract:
> This specification defines the term "Nonza", describing every top
> level stream element that is not a Stanza.
>
>
On 3/10/24 11:19 AM, Maxime Buquet wrote:
On 2024/03/10, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
XEP-0360.
Title: Nonzas (are not Stanzas)
Abstract:
This specification defines the term "Nonza", describing every top
level stream element that is not a
On 2024/03/10, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
> This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
> XEP-0360.
>
> Title: Nonzas (are not Stanzas)
> Abstract:
> This specification defines the term "Nonza", describing every top
> level stream element that is not a Stanza.
>
> URL:
On 3/10/24 9:18 AM, Daniel Gultsch wrote:
This message constitutes notice of a Last Call for comments on
XEP-0360.
Title: Nonzas (are not Stanzas)
Abstract:
This specification defines the term "Nonza", describing every top
level stream element that is not a Stanza.
URL:
13 matches
Mail list logo
