On Thu, Oct 24, 2019, at 18:32, Marvin W wrote:
> 1) At some point we might want to allow the usage of UTF-16 or any
>other encoding. Byte counts would have to be translated when re-
>encoding which a server is probably unable to do generically.
XMPP uses UTF-8, and there's almost no
On 10/25/19 3:15 PM, Sam Whited wrote:
On Thu, Oct 24, 2019, at 18:32, Marvin W wrote:
XMPP uses UTF-8, and there's almost no reason to use anything but UTF-8.
I do agree that this is true inside XMPP, but the data being transported
inside XMPP might be transcoded to non-xmpp transport
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019, at 14:25, Marvin W wrote:
> Yes and no. multi-codepoint emojis are still valid characters when
> split, whereas multi-byte codepoints cannot be split. There is
> nothing wrong with displaying the flag as *, so your
> implementation is always capable in strictly
