Am 13.04.20 um 13:21 schrieb Daniel Gultsch:
Hi,
webrtc uses rtcp-mux but to my knowledge XMPP has no way of signaling
that a party wants to use that.
Jitsi apparently just assumes that rtcp-mux is being used when bundles
are used [1] however that isn’t necessarily correct in all cases.
That
For bundling we already have https://xmpp.org/extensions/xep-0338.html
Only mux is w/o XEP.
Best Regards,
Sergey
пн, 13 апр. 2020 г. в 14:41, Daniel Gultsch :
> Am Mo., 13. Apr. 2020 um 11:33 Uhr schrieb Sergey Ilinykh <
> rion...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > I can't say anything about the history. But
Am 11.04.20 um 20:35 schrieb Holger Weiß:
* Philipp Hancke [2020-04-11 20:24]:
Am 11.04.20 um 20:01 schrieb Holger Weiß:
1. The "type" attribute specifies the "service type as registered with
the XMPP Registrar". As far as I can see, no types are registered so
far; and at least
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 09:51:37PM +0100, Matthew Wild wrote:
> The core of XEP-0313 that remains has actually gained some new features
> that were repeatedly requested by people to help with implementation
> issues. Importantly the namespace has not been bumped, but servers that
> support the new
Hi,
webrtc uses rtcp-mux but to my knowledge XMPP has no way of signaling
that a party wants to use that.
Jitsi apparently just assumes that rtcp-mux is being used when bundles
are used [1] however that isn’t necessarily correct in all cases.
Philipp Hancke apparently wrote a patch for XEP-0167
I can't say anything about the history. But I like Jitsi's implementation
and will add support to Psi soon.
Best Regards,
Sergey
пн, 13 апр. 2020 г. в 14:23, Daniel Gultsch :
> Hi,
>
> webrtc uses rtcp-mux but to my knowledge XMPP has no way of signaling
> that a party wants to use that.
>
>
Am Mo., 13. Apr. 2020 um 11:33 Uhr schrieb Sergey Ilinykh :
>
> I can't say anything about the history. But I like Jitsi's implementation and
> will add support to Psi soon.
Bundling and rtcp muxing is not the same thing. They are often used
together but not always.
Is there any down side in
