Am Dienstag, den 27.02.2018, 15:37 -0700 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
> On 2/27/18 10:33 AM, Ruslan N. Marchenko wrote:
> > That actually touches a point which is nagging me each time I'm
> > looking
> > into implementation. Who is responsible for closing the session?
> >
> > According to this [1]
On 2/27/18 10:33 AM, Ruslan N. Marchenko wrote:
> Am Montag, den 26.02.2018, 19:21 -0700 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>>
>> The idea there was to allow multiple files to be sent in a session;
>> you
>> wouldn't close the session if you want to send more files, so you
>> would
>> send the element def
Am Montag, den 26.02.2018, 19:21 -0700 schrieb Peter Saint-Andre:
>
> The idea there was to allow multiple files to be sent in a session;
> you
> wouldn't close the session if you want to send more files, so you
> would
> send the element defined in §8.1 instead. IMHO a good
> solution would be t
On 2/23/18 2:19 AM, Goffi wrote:
> Le vendredi 23 février 2018, 10:16:49 CET Goffi a écrit :
>> Le vendredi 23 février 2018, 10:02:15 CET Jonas Wielicki a écrit :
>>> On Freitag, 23. Februar 2018 09:47:00 CET Goffi wrote:
1) XEP-0234 is in Last Call which is supposed to be finished, what
Le lundi 26 février 2018, 17:20:15 CET Simon Friedberger a écrit :
> Don't you in most cases want hashes anyway to ensure the integrity of
> the files?
It's calculated during transfer yet, but I don't want to calculate hashed
of all the files I'm sharing before sending them.
>
> It's also not a
Don't you in most cases want hashes anyway to ensure the integrity of
the files?
It's also not actually that resource intensive to calculate the hash of
a file. Definitely negligible to transferring it.
On 26.02.2018 16:45, Goffi wrote:
>
> My problem is that I don't want to always calculate has
Le lundi 26 février 2018, 15:48:49 CET Tobias M a écrit :
> If XEP-0329 would also share the hashes, you could use the hash to to
> fetch things via Jingle FT, similar to what XEP-0385 does.
My problem is that I don't want to always calculate hashes, it's resource
intensive if I have large files
> On 26. Feb 2018, at 15:44, Tedd Sterr wrote:
>
> I see your point now - I was looking at XEP-0329 (File Information Sharing),
> where the shared files are requested using a full path; while your issue is
> that XEP-0234 (Jingle File Transfer) only wants a single file name (without
> path).
teful for advertising
large numbers of files. Not that it couldn't be extended..
From: Standards on behalf of Goffi
Sent: 26 February 2018 13:54
To: XMPP Standards
Subject: Re: [Standards] [XEP-0234] Jingle File Transfer, Last Call and File
Sharing
Hi Tedd,
t
Hi Tedd,
thanks for your feedback
Le dimanche 25 février 2018, 21:19:16 CET Tedd Sterr a écrit :
> The requestor should ask for the full path to the file, not the bare
> filename, so as long as you don't have two files with the same name in
> the same directory, there shouldn't be a conflict. T
> 2) for file sharing, I need more metadata, for instance the path needed to
> identify the file gotten from XEP-0329 : I don't want to always calculate
> hashes of all files I'm sharing to avoid consuming too much resources, and
> the name alone may not identify uniquely the file.
> How can I tran
Le vendredi 23 février 2018, 10:16:49 CET Goffi a écrit :
> Le vendredi 23 février 2018, 10:02:15 CET Jonas Wielicki a écrit :
> > On Freitag, 23. Februar 2018 09:47:00 CET Goffi wrote:
> > > 1) XEP-0234 is in Last Call which is supposed to be finished, what
> > > the
> > > status about that?
> >
Le vendredi 23 février 2018, 10:02:15 CET Jonas Wielicki a écrit :
> On Freitag, 23. Februar 2018 09:47:00 CET Goffi wrote:
> > 1) XEP-0234 is in Last Call which is supposed to be finished, what the
> > status about that?
>
> The Council vote isn’t over yet (but from what it looks like, advancemen
On Freitag, 23. Februar 2018 09:47:00 CET Goffi wrote:
> 1) XEP-0234 is in Last Call which is supposed to be finished, what the
> status about that?
The Council vote isn’t over yet (but from what it looks like, advancement will
be rejected since Daniels feedback has not been addressed; it looks l
Hello everybody,
As mentioned in my last message, I'm currently working on file sharing.
I have a couple of remarks with that:
1) XEP-0234 is in Last Call which is supposed to be finished, what the
status about that?
2) for file sharing, I need more metadata, for instance the path needed to
i
15 matches
Mail list logo
