[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-240?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549459
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-240:
-
I understand that what's at issue here is changing the library headers by
Today I've verified the patch for STDCXX-507 on gcc 4.2.0 and gcc
3.4.4.
The patch is here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12371246/cygwin.patch
ChangeLog:
STDCXX-507
* include/rw/_defs.h [__CYGWIN__ _RWSHARED]: #define _RWSTD_EXPORT
macro
using __declspec (dllexport)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-507:
-
Attachment: cygwin.patch
The patch is attached.
[Cygwin] Access violation while loading
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-507:
-
Attachment: (was: cygwin.patch)
[Cygwin] Access violation while loading libstdxxx.dll in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-507:
-
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
[Cygwin] Access violation while loading libstdxxx.dll in dynamic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-507?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549499
]
Farid Zaripov commented on STDCXX-507:
--
After the patch the examples and tests are built successfully.
But
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-242?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-242:
Affects Version/s: 4.2.0
Fix Version/s: (was: 4.2.1)
4.3
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549587
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-605:
-
I think this should work.
One question though: do we need to cast to
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Farid Zaripov wrote:
Today I've verified the patch for STDCXX-507 on gcc 4.2.0 and gcc
3.4.4.
I get really nervous whenever we start to mess around with the runtime
symbols, especially when changing which ones are exported on Windows
and which ones
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549606
]
Travis Vitek commented on STDCXX-605:
-
1. The original code casted to values. We can't cast to values, unless
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549576
]
vitek edited comment on STDCXX-605 at 12/7/07 2:23 PM:
--
New and improved. Hopefully
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Travis Vitek updated STDCXX-605:
Attachment: (was: stdcxx-605.patch)
[IBM XLC++] errors compiling dynatype.cpp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-605?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12549616
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-605:
-
I assume (1) is because of the compiler bug?
For (2) yes, if we can't
Martin Sebor wrote:
Farid Zaripov wrote:
Today I've verified the patch for STDCXX-507 on gcc 4.2.0 and gcc
3.4.4.
I get really nervous whenever we start to mess around with the runtime
symbols, especially when changing which ones are exported on Windows
and which ones aren't.
14 matches
Mail list logo