Re: question about serving pages from a database

2006-01-18 Thread Martin Sebor
Benjamin Gomez wrote: Hi Martin, The problem is that the headers being returned from the server include a content-type of text/plain instead of text/html. IE picks up the fact that it is formatted as a web page and displays as a web page, but Mozilla formats it as it is supposed to. Thanks.

Re: question about serving pages from a database

2006-01-18 Thread Martin Sebor
Benjamin Gomez wrote: Ok, after looking into this. Apache serves these pages through a cgi script and an anonymous checkout procedure. The links need to look like this at least the initial link to the documentation: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/incubator/stdcxx/trunk/doc/stdl

[jira] Assigned: (STDCXX-12) publish Class Reference and User Guide on the stdcxx site

2006-01-18 Thread Martin Sebor (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-12?page=all ] Martin Sebor reassigned STDCXX-12: -- Assign To: Martin Sebor publish Class Reference and User Guide on the stdcxx site -

Re: x.y.z numbering and releases

2006-01-18 Thread Martin Sebor
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Martin Sebor wrote: Justin Erenkrantz wrote: In the future, you should not reuse the version - therefore, this should really be 4.1.4. Once, 4.1.3 is posted, it's 'gone' (regardless of whether it passes or not). Therefore, a vote should be with respect to a

Re: x.y.z numbering and releases

2006-01-18 Thread Martin Sebor
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: [...] The candidate and number are pitched. We have a mantra, version numbers are cheap. Thanks for the clarification. [...] There is typically no allowance in these rules for making version changes that are not determined by changes and differences between

[jira] Closed: (STDCXX-12) publish Class Reference and User Guide on the stdcxx site

2006-01-18 Thread Martin Sebor (JIRA)
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-12?page=all ] Martin Sebor closed STDCXX-12: -- Resolution: Fixed After some discussion we've finally figured out how to do this -- see:

Re: x.y.z numbering and releases

2006-01-18 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On January 18, 2006 5:30:04 PM -0700 Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I don't think of the name of a file mentioned in emails as a release, least of all when it refers to a transient file in someone's home directory. Similarly, I don't consider an SVN branch to be an actual release,

Re: x.y.z numbering and releases

2006-01-18 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 09:45:54PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote: However, I believe that the issue can be just as effectively dealt with by implementing the -rcN (or similar) suffix policy that Bill mentioned in his first post, with the additional (and IMO essential) advantage of preserving the