-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:47 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]
Because in windows infrastructure the TZ environment
variable
Mark Brown wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sat, 16 Jun 2007 15:59:11 -0600
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: list of available cross-build result views
...is on the page below. This page and the cross-build views are
all set up to get generated from
Most of our Windows buils failed due to a change I committed over
the weekend (http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=554281).
I'm working on fixing the regression but the breakage highlighted
another problem that I'm hoping you might be able to quickly fix,
Andrew. Even though the builds
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:40 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 23.deque.special
Farid Zaripov wrote:
Below is a part of the 23.deque.special test. These rw_assert's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-109?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12511175
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-109:
-
We should be able to successfully build the library even when gencat
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:40 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 23.deque.special
Farid Zaripov wrote:
Below is a part of the 23.deque.special test. These
[Sun C++ 5.9] many warnings on -xarch=v9
Key: STDCXX-479
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-479
Project: C++ Standard Library
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Configuration
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 8:05 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 23.deque.special
Right, I think that will be necessary. I was under the
impression that you already did that in the change below
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:44 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intel C++ build issues on Windows
We'll also need a solution for those executables (but we can worry
Michael van der Westhuizen wrote:
Hi Martin,
On 7/7/07, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
I recall reading somewhere that Sun C++ 5.9 supports the gcc -m64
option but I can't find the reference. Do you happen to have a link?
The x86 equivalent I was able to find in the online
[Sun C++ 5.9] -xM outputs full preprocessed output for .S files
---
Key: STDCXX-480
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-480
Project: C++ Standard Library
Issue Type:
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:44 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Intel C++ build issues on Windows
We'll also need a solution for those executables (but we
Farid Zaripov wrote:
[...]
Are you suggesting to loosen the test so as not to exercise this
requirement?
I suggest only not to exercise iterators if one deque is empty.
But that would only hide the bug. swapping empty deques needs
to work (and not invalidate iterators) just as well as
Hi Martin,
On 7/9/07, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Check the list and Jira in case we figure out before you do
(otherwise keep us posted -- thanks!)
Thanks - I'll definitely keep an eye on the lists.
Michael
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 10:05 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: 23.deque.special
But in current implementation iterator not invalidated. Yes, it's
mebmers has changed, but it's still valid
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-480?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12511241
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-480:
-
Original Message
Subject: Re: (Incident Review ID:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12511250
]
Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-476:
-
Filed the following issue with Intel:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martin Sebor updated STDCXX-476:
Summary: [Intel Thread Checker 3.1] calls std::terminate() on an exception
in a thread function
Farid Zaripov wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 7:47 AM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: STDCXX examples fails and reasons [MSVC]
Because in windows infrastructure the TZ
Greetings Martin.
I've done a little digging, and the problem appears to originate in the
glue scripts used for nightly testing. In particular, the post-run
parser for windows incorrectly interprets a failure to build the library
as a hard (state C) failure, rather than a library (state F)
20 matches
Mail list logo