RE: how does rw_locales() work on Windows?

2007-08-27 Thread Farid Zaripov
-Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 3:01 AM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: how does rw_locales() work on Windows? Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: thread safety tests on Windows

2007-08-27 Thread Farid Zaripov
-Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 10:42 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: thread safety tests on Windows Travis Vitek wrote: I wonder if this is related to the rw_locales()

Re: thread safety tests on Windows

2007-08-27 Thread Martin Sebor
Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2007 10:42 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: thread safety tests on Windows Travis Vitek wrote: I wonder if this is related to the

Re: Exec utility test group reporting

2007-08-27 Thread Andrew Black
Greetings Mark At this point, the validity, usability and accuracy of the Doxygen comments in the exec utility is a theoretical exercise, as I don't think anyone's ever taken the step of generating the documentation pages from the source files. That said, I've installed doxygen locally, and will

Re: [RFC] stdcxx compatibility and versioning policy

2007-08-27 Thread Martin Sebor
Does this make sense to everyone? Are there any questions or comments? If not, I plan to put it up on our site sometime this week and start a vote to make our the official policy, so this would be a good time to provide feedback. Martin Martin Sebor wrote: The first draft of the stdcxx

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-524) buffer overflow in test 22.locale.time.get.cpp(make_LC_TIME)

2007-08-27 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Travis Vitek updated STDCXX-524: Fix Version/s: 4.2.1 Affects Version/s: 4.1.2 4.1.3

[jira] Created: (STDCXX-537) [XLC++ 9.0] std::uncaught_exception() false in terminate handler

2007-08-27 Thread Martin Sebor (JIRA)
[XLC++ 9.0] std::uncaught_exception() false in terminate handler Key: STDCXX-537 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-537 Project: C++ Standard Library Issue

ATOMIC_OPS.cpp on MSVC8.0-x64

2007-08-27 Thread Farid Zaripov
ATOMIC_OPS.cpp configuration test failed on MSVC8.0-x64 due to undefined external symbol _InterlockedIncrement. Because of this _RWSTD_NO_ATOMIC_OPS macro has been #defined in config.h. The InterlockedIncrement() function defined only in Win32 platform (located in kernel32.dll). At x64

[jira] Created: (STDCXX-538) ATOMIC_OPS.cpp test fails to link (unresolved external symbol: _InterlockedIncrement)

2007-08-27 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
ATOMIC_OPS.cpp test fails to link (unresolved external symbol: _InterlockedIncrement) - Key: STDCXX-538 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-538

[jira] Closed: (STDCXX-538) ATOMIC_OPS.cpp test fails to link (unresolved external symbol: _InterlockedIncrement)

2007-08-27 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov closed STDCXX-538. ATOMIC_OPS.cpp test fails to link (unresolved external symbol: _InterlockedIncrement)

[jira] Resolved: (STDCXX-538) ATOMIC_OPS.cpp test fails to link (unresolved external symbol: _InterlockedIncrement)

2007-08-27 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-538?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov resolved STDCXX-538. -- Resolution: Fixed Fixed thus: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=570199view=rev ATOMIC_OPS.cpp

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-497) [MSVC 7.1] std::num_put bad formatting of 0.0 with precision and showpoint

2007-08-27 Thread Andrew Black (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-497?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Black updated STDCXX-497: Fix Version/s: 4.2.1 Affects Version/s: 4.1.2 4.1.4 I suspect this

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-529) create test 22.locale.time.get.mt.cpp

2007-08-27 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-529?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Travis Vitek updated STDCXX-529: Attachment: 22.locale.time.get.mt.cpp create test 22.locale.time.get.mt.cpp

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-528) create test 22.locale.money.get.mt.cpp

2007-08-27 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Travis Vitek updated STDCXX-528: Attachment: 22.locale.money.get.mt.cpp create test 22.locale.money.get.mt.cpp

[jira] Resolved: (STDCXX-528) create test 22.locale.money.get.mt.cpp

2007-08-27 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-528?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Travis Vitek resolved STDCXX-528. - Resolution: Fixed create test 22.locale.money.get.mt.cpp

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-248) [Intel C++ 9.1/Windows] bad codegen initializing const POD struct

2007-08-27 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-248?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-248: - Fix Version/s: (was: trunk) 4.2 [Intel C++ 9.1/Windows] bad codegen

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-459) time_get::date_order() should return actually date order taken from locale

2007-08-27 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-459: - Fix Version/s: 4.2.1 Affects Version/s: 4.1.3 4.1.4

Re: ATOMIC_OPS.cpp on MSVC8.0-x64

2007-08-27 Thread Martin Sebor
Farid Zaripov wrote: ATOMIC_OPS.cpp configuration test failed on MSVC8.0-x64 due to undefined external symbol _InterlockedIncrement. Because of this _RWSTD_NO_ATOMIC_OPS macro has been #defined in config.h. The InterlockedIncrement() function defined only in Win32 platform (located in

[jira] Resolved: (STDCXX-462) std::time_get example exposes undefined behavior

2007-08-27 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov resolved STDCXX-462. -- Resolution: Fixed Documentation updated thus: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=570219view=rev

[jira] Closed: (STDCXX-462) std::time_get example exposes undefined behavior

2007-08-27 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-462?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov closed STDCXX-462. std::time_get example exposes undefined behavior

[RFC] draft stdcxx resolution for the Board

2007-08-27 Thread Martin Sebor
I'm working on the Board resolution based on the following page: http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html#tlp-resolution and I have a few issues I need help with. I'm hoping that our mentors can give us guidance here, although I certainly encourage everyone else, most of all

Re: svn commit: r569584 - in /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.0: GNUmakefile etc/config/GNUmakefile.cfg etc/config/makefile.rules etc/config/src/LIMITS.cpp etc/config/sunpro.config

2007-08-27 Thread Martin Sebor
Andrew Black wrote: *shrugs* I normally don't work with any part of subversion other than trunk, so I'm not as familiar with the procedures for working on the branches. I suppose I should have sent the proposed patch to the list while I was running the couple sanity builds, but I was more

RE: [RFC] draft stdcxx resolution for the Board

2007-08-27 Thread Eric Lemings
-Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 2:59 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [RFC] draft stdcxx resolution for the Board I'm working on the Board resolution based on the following page:

Re: [RFC] draft stdcxx resolution for the Board

2007-08-27 Thread Martin Sebor
Eric Lemings wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, August 27, 2007 2:59 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: [RFC] draft stdcxx resolution for the Board I'm working on the Board resolution based on the following page:

Re: svn commit: r569152 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.0/etc/config/src/LIMITS.cpp

2007-08-27 Thread Mark Brown
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sun, 26 Aug 2007 17:37:02 -0600 To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r569152 - /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.0/etc/config/src/LIMITS.cpp Mark Brown wrote: -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Exec utility test group reporting

2007-08-27 Thread Mark Brown
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Mon, 27 Aug 2007 09:11:51 -0600 To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Exec utility test group reporting Greetings Mark At this point, the validity, usability and accuracy of the Doxygen comments in the exec utility is