[jira] Assigned: (STDCXX-459) time_get::date_order() should return actually date order taken from locale

2007-11-29 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov reassigned STDCXX-459: Assignee: Farid Zaripov time_get::date_order() should return actually date order taken

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-459) time_get::date_order() should return actually date order taken from locale

2007-11-29 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-459: - Attachment: stdcxx-459.patch The proposed patch attached. time_get::date_order() should return

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-459) time_get::date_order() should return actually date order taken from locale

2007-11-29 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-459: - Patch Info: [Patch Available] time_get::date_order() should return actually date order taken

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-459) time_get::date_order() should return actually date order taken from locale

2007-11-29 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546778 ] Farid Zaripov commented on STDCXX-459: -- Another option might be extend the struct __rw_time_t with d_order_off

RE: svn commit: r597425 - in /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x: include/ansi/cwchar tests/strings/21.cwchar.cpp

2007-11-29 Thread Farid Zaripov
-Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 7:00 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r597425 - in /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x: include/ansi/cwchar tests/strings/21.cwchar.cpp No, I mean

RE: [jira] Updated: (STDCXX-459) time_get::date_order() should return actually date order taken from locale

2007-11-29 Thread Travis Vitek
The standard says the following about do_date_order() dateorder do_date_order() const; 1 Returns: An enumeration value indicating the preferred order of components for those date formats that are composed of day, month, and year. 244) Returns no_order if the date format specified by

[jira] Created: (STDCXX-675) [MSVC] implement autolinking feature

2007-11-29 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[MSVC] implement autolinking feature Key: STDCXX-675 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-675 Project: C++ Standard Library Issue Type: Improvement Components: Configuration

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-675) [MSVC] implement autolinking feature

2007-11-29 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546826 ] Farid Zaripov commented on STDCXX-675: -- Perhaps the another compilers may has the similar feature. [MSVC]

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-672) implement C++ 0x Concepts

2007-11-29 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-672?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-672: - Description: This is a placeholder to [conditionally] implement C++ 0x Concepts in the library

Re: [RFC] stdcxx release process, second draft

2007-11-29 Thread Travis Vitek
Martin Sebor wrote: Martin Sebor wrote: So here's a question: do we think STDCXX-336 doable for 4.2.1? Also, what's your take on STDCXX-242 and STDCXX-343? I think there might be others where it's not completely clear (at least to me) what is forward compatible and what's not.

RE: [jira] Updated: (STDCXX-459) time_get::date_order() should return actually date order taken from locale

2007-11-29 Thread Farid Zaripov
-Original Message- From: Travis Vitek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2007 7:35 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: RE: [jira] Updated: (STDCXX-459) time_get::date_order() should return actually date order taken from locale The standard says

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-459) time_get::date_order() should return actually date order taken from locale

2007-11-29 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Farid Zaripov updated STDCXX-459: - Attachment: (was: stdcxx-459.patch) time_get::date_order() should return actually date

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-459) time_get::date_order() should return actually date order taken from locale

2007-11-29 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-459?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546853 ] Farid Zaripov commented on STDCXX-459: -- ChangeLog: STDCXX-459 * include/loc/_time_get.h

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-675) [MSVC] implement autolinking feature

2007-11-29 Thread Martin Sebor (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-675?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546878 ] Martin Sebor commented on STDCXX-675: - I don't know of any UNIX compiler that has a feature like this. It seems

[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (STDCXX-375) std::getline() declared in istream, but should be declared in string

2007-11-29 Thread Farid Zaripov (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546884 ] farid edited comment on STDCXX-375 at 11/29/07 12:53 PM: - I've tried to declare the

[jira] Commented: (STDCXX-604) [IBM XLC++ 9.0] ICE on 23.bitset.cons.stdcxx-297

2007-11-29 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12546929 ] Travis Vitek commented on STDCXX-604: - Here is a simple testcase that illustrates the problem. [EMAIL

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-604) [IBM XLC++ 9.0] ICE on 23.bitset.cons.stdcxx-297

2007-11-29 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Travis Vitek updated STDCXX-604: Attachment: stdcxx-604.patch 2007-11-29 Travis Vitek [EMAIL PROTECTED] STDCXX-604

[jira] Updated: (STDCXX-604) [IBM XLC++ 9.0] ICE on 23.bitset.cons.stdcxx-297

2007-11-29 Thread Travis Vitek (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STDCXX-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Travis Vitek updated STDCXX-604: Patch Info: [Patch Available] [IBM XLC++ 9.0] ICE on 23.bitset.cons.stdcxx-297

welcome Travis Vitek

2007-11-29 Thread Martin Sebor
The stdcxx PMC has unanimously passed a vote to offer Travis Vitek commit privileges and Travis has accepted our offer. Please welcome Travis to the team! I've asked Travis to fax in his CLA at his earliest opportunity. As soon as the CLA has been recorded on the ASF committers page (follow the

Re: svn commit: r597425 - in /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x: include/ansi/cwchar tests/strings/21.cwchar.cpp

2007-11-29 Thread Martin Sebor
Farid Zaripov wrote: -Original Message- From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 7:00 PM To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r597425 - in /incubator/stdcxx/branches/4.2.x: include/ansi/cwchar tests/strings/21.cwchar.cpp

Re: [RFC] stdcxx release process, second draft

2007-11-29 Thread Martin Sebor
Travis Vitek wrote: Martin Sebor wrote: Martin Sebor wrote: So here's a question: do we think STDCXX-336 doable for 4.2.1? Also, what's your take on STDCXX-242 and STDCXX-343? I think there might be others where it's not completely clear (at least to me) what is forward compatible and