On Oct 2, 2007 3:01 PM, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It occurs to me that we might be able to preempt a potentially
contentious discussion by replacing the stdcxx Acknowledgment
page with one describing the pre-stdcxx history of the project
where we could retain any or all the names
Greetings all.
One thought that I have looking over the proposed patch is that it
doesn't include the names of people who have contribute code to the
release, but who aren't comitters. Scott Zhong and Travis Vitek both
have changes attributed to them, but neither name appears in the list.
I
Andrew Black wrote:
Greetings all.
One thought that I have looking over the proposed patch is that it
doesn't include the names of people who have contribute code to the
release, but who aren't comitters. Scott Zhong and Travis Vitek both
have changes attributed to them, but neither name
Martin Sebor wrote:
[...]
It occurs to me that we might be able to preempt a potentially
contentious discussion by replacing the stdcxx Acknowledgment
page with one describing the pre-stdcxx history of the project
where we could retain any or all the names from the current
acknowledgment page
On 10/3/07, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
[snip]
It occurs to me that we might be able to preempt a potentially
contentious discussion by replacing the stdcxx Acknowledgment
page with one describing the pre-stdcxx history of the project
where we could retain any or
In the patch attached to the issue Marc proposes to replace
the names of the original Rogue Wave contributors to the
project (which included support engineers as well management)
with those of stdcxx committers (including Emeriti). I'd like
to request people's opinion on this change. I personally
Martin Sebor wrote:
In the patch attached to the issue Marc proposes to replace
the names of the original Rogue Wave contributors to the
project (which included support engineers as well management)
with those of stdcxx committers (including Emeriti). I'd like
to request people's opinion on this
