[VOTE] publish stdcxx 4.1.3, take 2 (was: Re: Mac OS X and stdcxx )

2006-01-22 Thread Ravi Palepu
+1 p.s. Liviu - thanks for the tests on gcc RHAS 4 Itanium... Martin Sebor wrote: > Justin Erenkrantz wrote: > [...] > >>>Since several of them are involved and would require us to recertify >>>the library on all the platforms where it has passed my goal is to get >>>them fixed in 4.1.4. Do

Re: [VOTE] publish stdcxx 4.1.3, take 2 (was: Re: Mac OS X and stdcxx)

2006-01-18 Thread Justin Erenkrantz
--On January 12, 2006 3:26:52 PM -0700 Martin Sebor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I created a new tarball incorporating these changes and replaced the old one with it. Here's the link again for convenience: http://people.apache.org/~sebor/stdcxx/stdcxx-incubating-4.1.3.tar.gz The md5sum for this f

[VOTE] publish stdcxx 4.1.3, take 2 (was: Re: Mac OS X and stdcxx)

2006-01-12 Thread Martin Sebor
Justin Erenkrantz wrote: [...] Since several of them are involved and would require us to recertify the library on all the platforms where it has passed my goal is to get them fixed in 4.1.4. Does that sound reasonable? Sure. Let's just note that Mac OS X isn't supported in the release notes.