stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: "Pluggable Memory"
Martin Sebor wrote:
> Lance Diduck wrote:
>
>> To all: Here is an issue that may impact stdcxx.
>> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1850.pdf
[...]
> I skimmed the paper but I suspect I&#x
Martin Sebor wrote:
Lance Diduck wrote:
To all: Here is an issue that may impact stdcxx.
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2005/n1850.pdf
[...]
I skimmed the paper but I suspect I'll need to re-read it and spend
some time playing with the proposed classes to get a better
und
ls.
I see N1850 on the agenda for our Thursday 10/6 meeting (of the WG21
at Mont Tremblant).
However,
a
way we could promote Apache stdcxx is to offer a realistic solution,
that
operates with the Apache "Pluggable Memory" concept.
(http://xml.apache.org/xerces-c/program-others.html and
furthermore to pass these allocators around
from container to container.
I don't know how the library committee reviews these proposals. However, a
way we could promote Apache stdcxx is to offer a realistic solution, that
operates with the Apache "Pluggable Memory" concept.
(http://xml.ap
