Travis Vitek wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote
Martin Sebor wrote:
I've incorporated everyone's feedback and committed an updated
version with a number of enhancements of my own. Among the most
important are the new Goals section with suggested frequencies of
releases, and the integration of the
The Linux Documentation Project lists a number of examples of library
incompatibilities:
http://tldp.org/HOWTO/Program-Library-HOWTO/shared-libraries.html#AEN135
--Mark
On Dec 13, 2007 4:44 PM, Martin Sebor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote:
Travis Vitek wrote
Martin Sebor
The scope of this issue is rather large for a minor release...IMHO.
Brad.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Sebor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Martin Sebor
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 9:59 PM
To: stdcxx-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] stdcxx release
Martin Sebor wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
So here's a question: do we think STDCXX-336 doable for 4.2.1?
Also, what's your take on STDCXX-242 and STDCXX-343? I think there
might be others where it's not completely clear (at least to me)
what is forward compatible and what's not.
Travis Vitek wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
So here's a question: do we think STDCXX-336 doable for 4.2.1?
Also, what's your take on STDCXX-242 and STDCXX-343? I think there
might be others where it's not completely clear (at least to me)
what is forward compatible and
Travis Vitek wrote
Martin Sebor wrote:
I've incorporated everyone's feedback and committed an updated
version with a number of enhancements of my own. Among the most
important are the new Goals section with suggested frequencies of
releases, and the integration of the Version Policy (I
Martin Sebor wrote:
I've incorporated everyone's feedback and committed an
updated version
with a number of enhancements of my own. Among the most
important are
the new Goals section with suggested frequencies of
releases, and the
integration of the Version Policy (I plan to
So here's a question: do we think STDCXX-336 doable for 4.2.1?
Martin
Farid Zaripov wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
I've incorporated everyone's feedback and committed an
updated version
with a number of enhancements of my own. Among the most
important are
the new Goals section with suggested
Martin Sebor wrote:
So here's a question: do we think STDCXX-336 doable for 4.2.1?
Also, what's your take on STDCXX-242 and STDCXX-343? I think there
might be others where it's not completely clear (at least to me)
what is forward compatible and what's not.
Martin
Farid Zaripov wrote:
Martin Sebor wrote:
I've incorporated everyone's feedback and committed an updated
version with a number of enhancements of my own. Among the most
important are the new Goals section with suggested frequencies of
releases, and the integration of the Version Policy (I plan to delete
Overall, I'd say it's a pretty good start. All of the major elements
are
there: goals/objectives, tasks/procedures, definitions/roles, etc. As
it
evolves though, you'll probably want to break the process definitions
into
two separate documents: one for the development process and one for the
11 matches
Mail list logo