Re: [stdlib-sig] futures - a new package for asynchronous execution

2010-02-23 Thread sstein...@gmail.com
On Feb 23, 2010, at 5:00 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 3:31 AM, Brian Quinlan wrote: >>> >>> On Feb 22, 2010, at 2:37 PM, Jeffrey Yasskin wrote: >>> >>> Where's the current version of the PEP? >>> >>> >>> ht

Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)

2009-11-09 Thread sstein...@gmail.com
On Nov 9, 2009, at 1:11 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: On Mon, Nov 9, 2009 at 10:05 AM, sstein...@gmail.com wrote: On Nov 9, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: At Google we use a hacked-up version of pylint which seems infinitely flexible in the checks you can specify. I assume

Re: [stdlib-sig] standardizing the deprecation policy (and how noisy they are)

2009-11-09 Thread sstein...@gmail.com
On Nov 9, 2009, at 1:02 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: At Google we use a hacked-up version of pylint which seems infinitely flexible in the checks you can specify. I assume that the public version of pylint is just as capable -- someone just needs to write a rule for it. Is that "hacked-up" vers