On Thursday 08 October 2009 21:09:22 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thursday 08 October 2009 20:33:31 Frederik Schüler wrote:
> > On Friday 09 October 2009 01:14:13 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > On sparc, it is defined as "static struct regs regs;"
> > > Nothing has changed in this area since v4.5.18.
>
On Thursday 08 October 2009 20:33:31 Frederik Schüler wrote:
> On Friday 09 October 2009 01:14:13 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On sparc, it is defined as "static struct regs regs;"
> > Nothing has changed in this area since v4.5.18.
>
> Yes, still barfing:
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Ilinux/s
Hi!
On Friday 09 October 2009 01:14:13 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On sparc, it is defined as "static struct regs regs;"
> Nothing has changed in this area since v4.5.18.
Yes, still barfing:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Ilinux/sparc -I../linux/sparc -Ilinux -I../linux
-Wall -g -O2 -MT syscall.
On Thursday 08 October 2009 19:14:13 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:00:50PM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
> [...]
>
> > and on sparc:
> >
> > gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Ilinux/sparc -I../linux/sparc -Ilinux
> > -I../linux -Wall -g -O2 -MT syscall.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/syscal
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 03:00:50PM +0200, Frederik Schüler wrote:
[...]
> and on sparc:
>
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -Ilinux/sparc -I../linux/sparc -Ilinux
> -I../linux
> -Wall -g -O2 -MT syscall.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/syscall.Tpo -c -o syscall.o
> ../syscall.c
[...]
> ../syscall.c: In funct
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 04:27:22PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> Add pretty printing of sembuf argument to semop() and semtimedop()
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 08:41:29PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Add support for Linux/no-mmu with vfork
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 08:41:56PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote
On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 07:03:14PM -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Mike Frysinger already submitted a fix for this issue, I'm going to check
> > it on x86 and x86-64, and merge it if everything is OK.
>
> Ok.
>
> > Another small issue is file timestamps in release tarball.
> > Since git does not
On Thu, Oct 08, 2009 at 03:07:33AM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Oct 07, 2009 at 10:25:10PM +0200, Jakub Bogusz wrote:
> [...]
> > OK, updated patch attached.
>
> There are two issues remained which should be addressed.
>
> First, redundancy should be avoided.
> You patch intro