Re: [PATCH] Fix msgsnd indirect ipccall

2010-04-06 Thread Anton Blanchard
Hi, > Nice catch. Apparently, your patch fixes regression introduced by > my commit v4.5.18-136-g783f5bc. > Would you like to write a commit message in ChangeLog style? Sure! Anton -- 2010-04-05 Anton Blanchard Fix regression in msgsnd indirect ipccall: * ipc.c (tprint_msgsnd): Add fl

Re: [PATCH] Fix msgsnd indirect ipccall

2010-04-02 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 09:53:38PM +0400, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:31:22PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: > > The flags field was bogus if we came in via an indirect ipccall, so fix it. > > Nice catch. Apparently, your patch fixes regression introduced by > my commit v4.

Re: [PATCH] Fix msgsnd indirect ipccall

2010-03-31 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 12:31:22PM +1100, Anton Blanchard wrote: > The flags field was bogus if we came in via an indirect ipccall, so fix it. Nice catch. Apparently, your patch fixes regression introduced by my commit v4.5.18-136-g783f5bc. Would you like to write a commit message in ChangeLog st

[PATCH] Fix msgsnd indirect ipccall

2010-03-30 Thread Anton Blanchard
The flags field was bogus if we came in via an indirect ipccall, so fix it. Signed-off-by: Anton Blanchard --- diff --git a/ipc.c b/ipc.c index 553aa81..4c902bf 100644 --- a/ipc.c +++ b/ipc.c @@ -212,7 +212,8 @@ struct tcb *tcp; } static void -tprint_msgsnd(struct tcb *tcp, long addr, unsig