Re: [PATCH v9] Implement decoding of statx syscall

2017-04-16 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 11:26:59AM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote: > On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:28:19PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > > > Linux commit v4.11-rc6~5^2^2~1 has added STATX__RESERVED bit. > > Should we actually do something about this one? It's actually tested by statx syscall, so

Re: [PATCH v9] Implement decoding of statx syscall

2017-04-15 Thread Victor Krapivensky
On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 04:28:19PM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > Linux commit v4.11-rc6~5^2^2~1 has added STATX__RESERVED bit. Should we actually do something about this one? Also, it is OK that linux/xtensa/syscallent.h does not contain entries for syscalls 348...350 (pkey_{mprotect,alloc,fre

Re: [PATCH v9] Implement decoding of statx syscall

2017-04-12 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 06:19:07PM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote: [...] Note that a few more statx bits and pieces have seeped into v4.11: > diff --git a/linux/x86_64/syscallent.h b/linux/x86_64/syscallent.h > index 62960d2..73165b8 100644 > --- a/linux/x86_64/syscallent.h > +++ b/linux/x86_64/

Re: [PATCH v9] Implement decoding of statx syscall

2017-03-18 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 06:19:07PM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote: > * linux/i386/syscallent.h [383]: Add statx entry. > * linux/x32/syscallent.h [332]: Likewise. > * linux/x86_64/syscallent.h [332]: Likewise. > * pathtrace.c (pathtrace_match): Handle SEN_statx. > * statx.c: New file. > * statx.h:

[PATCH v9] Implement decoding of statx syscall

2017-03-18 Thread Victor Krapivensky
* linux/i386/syscallent.h [383]: Add statx entry. * linux/x32/syscallent.h [332]: Likewise. * linux/x86_64/syscallent.h [332]: Likewise. * pathtrace.c (pathtrace_match): Handle SEN_statx. * statx.c: New file. * statx.h: Likewise. * Makefile.am (strace_SOURCES): Add them. * tests/.gitignore: Add sta