Re: GSOC 2017: Project Proposal

2017-04-06 Thread sandhya bankar
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 7:27 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:07:22AM +0530, sandhya bankar wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 09:26:59PM +0530, sandhya bankar wrote: >> >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Eugene

Re: GSOC 2017: Project Proposal

2017-04-06 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 10:07:22AM +0530, sandhya bankar wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 09:26:59PM +0530, sandhya bankar wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov > >> wrote: > >> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 0

Re: GSOC 2017: Project Proposal

2017-04-04 Thread sandhya bankar
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:43 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 09:26:59PM +0530, sandhya bankar wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote: >> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:51:34PM +0530, sandhya bankar wrote: >> >> To deal with code coverage, I wil

Re: GSOC 2017: Project Proposal

2017-04-03 Thread Eugene Syromiatnikov
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 09:26:59PM +0530, sandhya bankar wrote: > On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:51:34PM +0530, sandhya bankar wrote: > >> To deal with code coverage, I will run individual test cases to find > >> out why the coverage is b

Re: GSOC 2017: Project Proposal

2017-04-03 Thread sandhya bankar
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 9:10 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:51:34PM +0530, sandhya bankar wrote: >> To deal with code coverage, I will run individual test cases to find >> out why the coverage is below 100%. > > OK, let's be more specific: what are your suggestions in

Re: GSOC 2017: Project Proposal

2017-04-03 Thread Eugene Syromiatnikov
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:51:34PM +0530, sandhya bankar wrote: > To deal with code coverage, I will run individual test cases to find > out why the coverage is below 100%. OK, let's be more specific: what are your suggestions in regards of increasing coverage of dm.c up to 100%?

Re: GSOC 2017: Project Proposal

2017-04-03 Thread sandhya bankar
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 8:32 PM, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote: > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:08:34PM +0530, sandhya bankar wrote: >> Please review my proposal link for the project "Comprehensive test suite" >> >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RY5cdJGb0UVN-5q5imuwrcVnFRlVgM0Rx3okdrfkxTU/edit?us

Re: GSOC 2017: Project Proposal

2017-04-03 Thread Eugene Syromiatnikov
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:08:34PM +0530, sandhya bankar wrote: > Please review my proposal link for the project "Comprehensive test suite" > > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RY5cdJGb0UVN-5q5imuwrcVnFRlVgM0Rx3okdrfkxTU/edit?usp=sharing Can you please provide information regarding the sched

GSOC 2017: Project Proposal

2017-04-03 Thread sandhya bankar
Hello, Please review my proposal link for the project "Comprehensive test suite" https://docs.google.com/document/d/1RY5cdJGb0UVN-5q5imuwrcVnFRlVgM0Rx3okdrfkxTU/edit?usp=sharing Thanks, Sandhya -- Check out the vibr