On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 17:20:32 +0300
"Dmitry V. Levin" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 05:06:02PM +0300, Edgar Kaziahmedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:46:03 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 02:35:17PM +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Apr 0
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 05:06:02PM +0300, Edgar Kaziahmedov wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:46:03 +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 02:35:17PM +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> > > On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 04:29:36AM +0300, Edgar Kaziahmedov wrote:
> > > > https://github.co
On Mon, 3 Apr 2017 15:46:03 +0300
"Dmitry V. Levin" wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 02:35:17PM +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 04:29:36AM +0300, Edgar Kaziahmedov wrote:
> > > https://github.com/edosedgar/xs-pkg/blob/master/proposal.txt
> >
> > The other thing (be
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 02:35:17PM +0200, Eugene Syromiatnikov wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 04:29:36AM +0300, Edgar Kaziahmedov wrote:
> > https://github.com/edosedgar/xs-pkg/blob/master/proposal.txt
>
> The other thing (besides syscallents.h) I think might useful to leverage
> is the current
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 04:29:36AM +0300, Edgar Kaziahmedov wrote:
> https://github.com/edosedgar/xs-pkg/blob/master/proposal.txt
The other thing (besides syscallents.h) I think might useful to leverage
is the current syscall filtering mechanism, so it would be possible to
check out which system c
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 5:56 PM, Victor Krapivensky
wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 05:28:55AM +0200, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
>> The one quite interesting aspect, from my point of view, is the way you
>> expect to access (and modify) argument data. For example, some syscalls
>> (like sendmsg
The new version of proposal
And it looks like you have forgotten to look my patch set
[PATCH v4 0/3]: v4l2 microproject (GSoC 2017),
please review
https://github.com/edosedgar/xs-pkg/blob/master/proposal.txt
Regards,
Edgar Kaziahmedov
pgpfq51r6sZRf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
On Fri, 31 Mar 2017 23:45:43 +0300
"Dmitry V. Levin" wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 03:51:41AM +0300, Edgar Kaziahmedov wrote:
> > This is my proposal, please review
> >
> > I am waiting for feedback and on my last days I am doing changes to
> > specify information.
> >
> > https://github.co
On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 03:51:41AM +0300, Edgar Kaziahmedov wrote:
> This is my proposal, please review
>
> I am waiting for feedback and on my last days I am doing changes to
> specify information.
>
> https://github.com/edosedgar/xs-pkg/blob/master/proposal.txt
My idea of a syscall informatio
This is my proposal, please review
I am waiting for feedback and on my last days I am doing changes to
specify information.
https://github.com/edosedgar/xs-pkg/blob/master/proposal.txt
pgpD3ojp3XTkp.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 05:28:55AM +0200, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> The one quite interesting aspect, from my point of view, is the way you
> expect to access (and modify) argument data. For example, some syscalls
> (like sendmsg or evdev/dm ioctls or siginfo-related ones) have quite
> non-triv
Hello.
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 10:58:16PM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote:
> The first draft of my proposal can be found here:
>
> https://gist.github.com/shdown/a1f3f2bce1210f55389bacf406030b25
>
> As for now, it is incomplete (does not even contain schedule) and will
> surely be updated and en
The first draft of my proposal can be found here:
https://gist.github.com/shdown/a1f3f2bce1210f55389bacf406030b25
As for now, it is incomplete (does not even contain schedule) and will
surely be updated and enhanced later.
Please provide some feedback.
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
