On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:10:34AM +0530, Prateek Gupta wrote:
> So, is the idea to remove all these code redundancies and provide a
> structured way to support multiarchitecture in a new way or to extend the
> current implementation?
>
> Regards,
> Prateek
Do you really think I'd propose extendi
So, is the idea to remove all these code redundancies and provide a
structured way to support multiarchitecture in a new way or to extend the
current implementation?
Regards,
Prateek
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 5:11 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:34:55AM +0530, Prateek Gupt
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:34:55AM +0530, Prateek Gupta wrote:
> As far as I percieve, the multiarchitecture support project is about making
> a hierarchial set of the parsers to firstly compiling all general parser
> required by every arch and then compiling only those that are required by
> the a
As far as I percieve, the multiarchitecture support project is about making
a hierarchial set of the parsers to firstly compiling all general parser
required by every arch and then compiling only those that are required by
the arch that the user's system has.
My approach for the problem is to deve
Hi,
Can i get some overview on the multi architecture mechanism currently
implemented in strace?
Regards,
Prateek
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Prateek Gupta wrote:
> Hi Rajul,Philippe
>
> I am interested to work on the idea reliable multiarchitecture support.
> Can you please guide me as
Hi Rajul,Philippe
I am interested to work on the idea reliable multiarchitecture support. Can
you please guide me as to what part of the source code should I look for
the current multiarchitecture support present in strace-4.9 and highlight
some of the key problems being faced by the present imple
Thanks for the replies.
I am sorry that I could not reply any sooner because I was out of station.
I have started working on the proposal and will soon share an initial draft
for insight. In the meantime I have some queries which I will convey to you
soon.
Regards,
Prateek
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at
hi Philippe Ombredanne
plz find attached example with this maIl
On Sat, Mar 7, 2015 at 7:26 AM, Amish Mittal
wrote:
> hi Philippe Ombredanne
> i read last year's conversation , and i have created a small prototype
> of json output using -j option in argument list.
> https://github.com/am
hi Philippe Ombredanne
i read last year's conversation , and i have created a small prototype
of json output using -j option in argument list.
https://github.com/amishasdf12/gsocStrace
currently this works only with -T flag only. plz have a look on it and
acknowledge me whether i am going
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 7:17 AM, Amish Mittal wrote:
> hi
> i am Amish Mittal sutdent of IIT Guwahati (INDIA) , i have gone
> through source code of strace 4.9 , i am interested in Structured output
> project . it is mentioned in the project detail that there has been a
> project on this to
On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 02:03:51AM +0800, 杨秉武 wrote:
> To understand a program how to run, it's the easiest way to write test
> unit:).So i take some time to test the strace.
> I check the makefile to find some test target (like make test but i do not
> find), i find this
>
> > RECURSIVE_TARGETS =
Hi Prateek,
> I am a 4th year undergraduate student pursuing B.E.(Hons.) Computer Science
> from BITS Pilani, India.
Glad to see you here.
> I am interested to participate in GSoC 2015 and
> find strace as an interesting project to contribute.
We look forward to your application.
> I have work
On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 5:12 PM, Prateek Gupta
wrote:
> Hello,
> I am a 4th year undergraduate student pursuing B.E.(Hons.) Computer Science
> from BITS Pilani, India. I am interested to participate in GSoC 2015 and
> find strace as an interesting project to contribute.
Hello Prateek and welcome t
13 matches
Mail list logo
