Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Eugene Syromyatnikov
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov > wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Schwab >> wrote: >>> On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov >>> >>> wrote: >>> May be you have any ideas regarding possibilities of fixing th

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:49:28AM +, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov > > wrote: > > > >> May be you have any ideas regarding possibilities of fixing the > >> environment in order to get nanosleep? >

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Schwab > wrote: >> On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov >> >> wrote: >> >>> May be you have any ideas regarding possibilities of fixing the >>> environment in order to get nanosleep? >> >> What do you mean

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:08:24AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > I'm seeing this testsuite failure: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Andreas_Schwab:Factory/strace/s/s390x > > FAIL: count > === > > Pattern of expected output: *[^ ]+ +(1\.[01]|0\.99)[^n]*nanosle

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Eugene Syromyatnikov
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov > wrote: > >> May be you have any ideas regarding possibilities of fixing the >> environment in order to get nanosleep? > > What do you mean with "in order to get nanosleep"? In order to get nanosleep wi

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:08:24AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > I'm seeing this testsuite failure: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Andreas_Schwab:Factory/strace/s/s390x > > FAIL: count > === > > Pattern of expected output: *[^ ]+ +(1\.[01]|0\.99)[^n]*nanosle

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote: > May be you have any ideas regarding possibilities of fixing the > environment in order to get nanosleep? What do you mean with "in order to get nanosleep"? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Eugene Syromyatnikov
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > I'm seeing this testsuite failure: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Andreas_Schwab:Factory/strace/s/s390x > > FAIL: count > === > > Pattern of expected output: *[^ ]+ +(1\.[01]|0\.99)[^n]*nanosleep > Actual

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Andreas Schwab
I'm seeing this testsuite failure: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Andreas_Schwab:Factory/strace/s/s390x FAIL: count === Pattern of expected output: *[^ ]+ +(1\.[01]|0\.99)[^n]*nanosleep Actual output: % time seconds usecs/call callserrors syscall ---