On Tue 11 Mar 2014 05:50:04 Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 09:21:19PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Mon 10 Mar 2014 17:40:17 enh wrote:
> > > i think we might be talking at cross purposes. the pid/uid stuff that
> > >
> > > isn't relevant for SI_TIMER isn't in sigval_t; it'
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 09:21:19PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon 10 Mar 2014 17:40:17 enh wrote:
> > i think we might be talking at cross purposes. the pid/uid stuff that
>
> > isn't relevant for SI_TIMER isn't in sigval_t; it's in siginfo_t. i
> > did factor out the sigval_t stuff.
>
> y
On Mon 10 Mar 2014 17:40:17 enh wrote:
please don't top post
> i think we might be talking at cross purposes. the pid/uid stuff that
> isn't relevant for SI_TIMER isn't in sigval_t; it's in siginfo_t. i
> did factor out the sigval_t stuff.
yes, you factored out sigval_t, but you also copied & pa
i think we might be talking at cross purposes. the pid/uid stuff that
isn't relevant for SI_TIMER isn't in sigval_t; it's in siginfo_t. i
did factor out the sigval_t stuff.
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Mon 10 Mar 2014 17:08:11 enh wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4
On Mon 10 Mar 2014 17:08:11 enh wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Thu 06 Mar 2014 18:20:50 enh wrote:
> >> #ifdef SI_FROMUSER
> >> if (SI_FROMUSER(sip)) {
> >> - tprintf(", si_pid=%lu, si_uid=%lu",
> >> -
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Thu 06 Mar 2014 18:20:50 enh wrote:
>> Decode siginfo_t more clearly for si_code SI_TIMER.
>>
>> The 'pid' is actually a POSIX timer id, and the 'uid' is actually the
>> overrun.
>>
>> Also factor out the si_value dumping so it's the same
On Thu 06 Mar 2014 18:20:50 enh wrote:
> Decode siginfo_t more clearly for si_code SI_TIMER.
>
> The 'pid' is actually a POSIX timer id, and the 'uid' is actually the
> overrun.
>
> Also factor out the si_value dumping so it's the same for every si_code.
please use `git send-email` rather than a
Decode siginfo_t more clearly for si_code SI_TIMER.
The 'pid' is actually a POSIX timer id, and the 'uid' is actually the overrun.
Also factor out the si_value dumping so it's the same for every si_code.
Signed-off-by: Elliott Hughes
diff --git a/signal.c b/signal.c
index ce8ec0a..69fea37 10064