Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Eugene Syromyatnikov
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov > wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Schwab >> wrote: >>> On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov >>> >>> wrote: >>> May be you have any ideas regarding possibilities of fixing th

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Heiko Carstens
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 09:49:28AM +, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > > On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov > > wrote: > > > >> May be you have any ideas regarding possibilities of fixing the > >> environment in order to get nanosleep? >

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Schwab > wrote: >> On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov >> >> wrote: >> >>> May be you have any ideas regarding possibilities of fixing the >>> environment in order to get nanosleep? >> >> What do you mean

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:08:24AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > I'm seeing this testsuite failure: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Andreas_Schwab:Factory/strace/s/s390x > > FAIL: count > === > > Pattern of expected output: *[^ ]+ +(1\.[01]|0\.99)[^n]*nanosle

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Eugene Syromyatnikov
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov > wrote: > >> May be you have any ideas regarding possibilities of fixing the >> environment in order to get nanosleep? > > What do you mean with "in order to get nanosleep"? In order to get nanosleep wi

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 11:08:24AM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote: > I'm seeing this testsuite failure: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Andreas_Schwab:Factory/strace/s/s390x > > FAIL: count > === > > Pattern of expected output: *[^ ]+ +(1\.[01]|0\.99)[^n]*nanosle

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Andreas Schwab
On Okt 05 2016, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote: > May be you have any ideas regarding possibilities of fixing the > environment in order to get nanosleep? What do you mean with "in order to get nanosleep"? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Eugene Syromyatnikov
On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:08 AM, Andreas Schwab wrote: > I'm seeing this testsuite failure: > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Andreas_Schwab:Factory/strace/s/s390x > > FAIL: count > === > > Pattern of expected output: *[^ ]+ +(1\.[01]|0\.99)[^n]*nanosleep > Actual

Re: strace 4.14 released

2016-10-05 Thread Andreas Schwab
I'm seeing this testsuite failure: https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/home:Andreas_Schwab:Factory/strace/s/s390x FAIL: count === Pattern of expected output: *[^ ]+ +(1\.[01]|0\.99)[^n]*nanosleep Actual output: % time seconds usecs/call callserrors syscall ---

strace 4.14 released

2016-10-04 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
Starting with version 4.13, strace follows the schedule of linux kernel, and new versions of strace are released along with new version of linux kernel. So strace 4.14 is tagged and uploaded. I'd like to use this opportunity to thank all who contributed to this release. $ git tag -v v4.14 2> /de