RFC: raising minimum supported linux kernel version to v2.5.46

2015-02-15 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
Hi, Do you think it's time to assume that PTRACE_SETOPTIONS and PTRACE_O_TRACESYSGOOD|PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC|PTRACE_O_TRACECLONE are universally available and working? If yes, then all code that supports post-execve SIGTRAP and implements fork/vfork/clone->CLONE_PTRACE substitution could be removed.

Re: RFC: raising minimum supported linux kernel version to v2.5.46

2015-02-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On 15 Feb 2015 15:47, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > Do you think it's time to assume that PTRACE_SETOPTIONS and > PTRACE_O_TRACESYSGOOD|PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC|PTRACE_O_TRACECLONE are > universally available and working? > > If yes, then all code that supports post-execve SIGTRAP and implements > fork/vfork

Re: RFC: raising minimum supported linux kernel version to v2.5.46

2015-02-15 Thread Philippe Ombredanne
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On 15 Feb 2015 15:47, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: >> Do you think it's time to assume that PTRACE_SETOPTIONS and >> PTRACE_O_TRACESYSGOOD|PTRACE_O_TRACEEXEC|PTRACE_O_TRACECLONE are >> universally available and working? >> >> If yes, then all code

Re: RFC: raising minimum supported linux kernel version to v2.5.46

2015-02-15 Thread enh
Android's been >= 2.6 forever so we won't notice. On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 10:48 AM, Philippe Ombredanne wrote: > On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:49 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On 15 Feb 2015 15:47, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: >>> Do you think it's time to assume that PTRACE_SETOPTIONS and >>> PTRACE_O_TRA