[PATCH v3] Decode RUSAGE_THREAD

2017-03-16 Thread Victor Krapivensky
* xlat/usagewho.in: Add values for existing entities, add RUSAGE_THREAD. * tests/getrusage.c: Test decoding of RUSAGE_THREAD. --- tests/getrusage.c | 31 +-- xlat/usagewho.in | 7 --- 2 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/getrusage.

Re: [PATCH v2] Implemented -e trace=%clock option for clock_* related syscalls

2017-03-16 Thread Rishi Bhatt
Patched the changes that you have mentioned. On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 7:45 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 12:17:08AM +0530, Rishi Bhatt wrote: > > linux/*/syscallent.h part is modified automatically by: > > > > git grep -Fl 'SEN(clock_' linux/ | xargs sed -i \ > >

Re: [PATCH v2] Decode RUSAGE_THREAD

2017-03-16 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 04:38:27AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:01:40AM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote: > > * xlat/usagewho.in: Add values for existing values, add RUSAGE_THREAD. > > * tests/getrusage.c: Test decoding of RUSAGE_THREAD. > > --- > > tests/getrusage.c |

Re: [PATCH v3] Decode RUSAGE_THREAD

2017-03-16 Thread Dmitry V. Levin
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 10:35:40AM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote: > * xlat/usagewho.in: Add values for existing entities, add > RUSAGE_THREAD. > * tests/getrusage.c: Test decoding of RUSAGE_THREAD. Applied, thanks! -- ldv pgpUyTRNtQNZ_.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: GSOC: Introduction

2017-03-16 Thread Abhishek Tiwari
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Abhishek Tiwari wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:14 PM, Abhishek Tiwari > wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 8:44 AM, Abhishek Tiwari >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 12:40:46AM +0530, Abhishek

Re: Q: statfs related syscalls (was: Re: GSOC: Introduction)

2017-03-16 Thread Abhishek Tiwari
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 5:54 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:14:29PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote: > [...] >> Is it fine to group statfs+ statfs64+ fstatfs + fstatfs64 + ustat as >> %statfs or it should be (statfs+statfs64 + ustat) and >> (fstatfs+ftsatfs64) i.e. two diffe

Re: Gsoc Introduction.

2017-03-16 Thread Nikolay Marchuk
Thank you for review. I have rewritten my code, but I still have some problems with NS_GET_NSTYPE parsing without additional argument. And new tests are not fully tested, because I haven't build kernel yet. On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:01 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote: > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 03:22:3