On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:47 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:26:20AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>> From f6d4386bd952ee6ac1983937cc631ececf5bc277 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Abhishek Tiwari
>> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 09:20:07 +0530
>> Subject: [PATCH v4] Fix missing
ok. patched.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 7:47 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 03:42:04AM +0530, Rishi Bhatt wrote:
> > From 294db67743eb8509383cf80887747016271dd32a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Rishi Bhatt
> > Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 03:31:24 +0530
> > Subject: [PATCH] Imp
I updated the patch[1] and the proposal draft[2].
Please provide some feedback.
Thank you.
[1]https://github.com/ppiao/strace/tree/nl-socket
[2]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/15cVdpdBP6jzEGP74tSG18ymi278_P2uv8MhRus-CuPI/edit?usp=sharing
>On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 10:37 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrot
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 4:50 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:40:48AM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
>> >> Sir,
>> >> the statfs64.test file calls the statfs.test itself.
>> >> On adding 17 statfs64 to my test file gives error
>> >>
>> >> undefined: __NR_statfs64
>> > This is
Hi,
I've built strace 4.14 successfully a hundred times, but a colleague
on a remote system (I can't get to it) is seeing two of the "make
check" tests fail, msg_control and msg_control-v. All the other
tests run without error.
The environment is
Hi,
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:53:00AM -0400, Andy Riebs wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've built strace 4.14 successfully a hundred times, but a colleague
> on a remote system (I can't get to it) is seeing two of the "make
> check" tests fail, msg_control and msg_control-v. All the other
Bingo! The problem system has that set to 4GiB, where msg_control.c
looks for a max of 1GiB.
Many thanks for your help!
Andy
On 03/29/2017 11:30 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 10:53:00AM -0400, Andy Riebs wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've built strace 4.14
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:18:29PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
> Drop support of x86_64 kernels < 2.6.34
> without PTRACE_GETREGSET support.
I think dropping support for kernels like 2.6.32 this early is not a very
good idea. At least, it's quite dramatic change from "Linux kernel >=
On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 02:27:03 +0300
"Dmitry V. Levin" wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 06:21:28PM +0300, Edgar Kaziahmedov wrote:
> > As a new kernel version, commit adds additional
> > defines to xlat/v4l2*.in files.
>
> It won't harm if you added the kernel version you are synchronising
> xla
* v4l2.c: add meaningful and informative printings for all
v4l2 buf types in the 'print_v4l2_format_fmt' routine,
implementation print_v4l2_clip routine to print the clips field
in case of the overlay type buf
* xlat/v4l2_vbi_flags.in: new flags for and V4L2_BUF_TYPE_VBI*
* xlat/v4l2_sliced_flags.i
* tests/ioctl_v4l2.c: In accordance with changes made,
this commit adds tests for the new functionality.
Moreover, to avoid the "copy-paste" code for ioctl's requests
like VIDIOC_TRY_FMT and VIDIOC_S_FMT there are
special functions: init_v4l2_format, print_ioctl_v4l2.
Signed-off-by: Edgar Kaziahme
Linux 4.4: V4L2_BUF_TYPE_SDR_OUTPUT, V4L2_COLORSPACE_DCI_P3,
V4L2_COLORSPACE_BT2020
Linux 4.2: V4L2_BUF_FLAG_LAST, V4L2_COLORSPACE_RAW
Linux 3.8: V4L2_MEMORY_DMABUF
Linux 3.6: V4L2_BUF_FLAG_INPUT is not useful
Linux 3.19: V4L2_COLORSPACE_ADOBERGB
Linux 3.17: V4L2_CAP_EXT_PIX_FORMAT
Linux 3.15:
Inhanced informativeness of the ioctl syscall(for the range of
requests owned to v4l2) and tests.
v1: just the first attempt to change(contained mistakes)
v2: add all printings
v3: fix some mistakes and add tests
v4: fix several bugs, separate commits and rewrite tests
On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 10:53:48AM +0300, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 01:16:23AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On 14 Mar 2017 00:57, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > so there's a disagreement in the overall system somewhere.
> > > i'd assume either the kernel's implementation of
On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 08:06:18PM +0200, Eugene Syromyatnikov wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:18:29PM +0300, Gleb Fotengauer-Malinovskiy wrote:
> > Drop support of x86_64 kernels < 2.6.34
> > without PTRACE_GETREGSET support.
> I think dropping support for kernels like 2.6.32 this early is not
Hello.
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 10:58:16PM +0300, Victor Krapivensky wrote:
> The first draft of my proposal can be found here:
>
> https://gist.github.com/shdown/a1f3f2bce1210f55389bacf406030b25
>
> As for now, it is incomplete (does not even contain schedule) and will
> surely be updated and en
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Abhishek Tiwari
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Abhishek Tiwari
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:59 AM, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 06:22:51PM +0530, Abhishek Tiwari wrote:
Sir,
I have gone through mail
17 matches
Mail list logo