cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc index.xml

2001-06-23 Thread rleland
rleland 01/06/23 21:55:08 Modified:doc index.xml Log: Correct typo in index.xml Bugzilla 2205 submitted by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Revision ChangesPath 1.7 +2 -3 jakarta-struts/doc/index.xml Index: index.xml ===

Re: server-side, java-based validation rules for struts..

2001-06-23 Thread Martin Cooper
> Slightly more exact mechanics for registering the listeners are: > 1. Instantiate the form-bean > 2. Instantiate zero to many listeners > 3. Register each listener [...] This sounds like it could be an expensive process to be going through on each request. I think you'd want to arrange for the

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc release-notes-1.1-ms1.xml

2001-06-23 Thread rleland
rleland 01/06/23 21:08:43 Added: doc release-notes-1.1-ms1.xml Log: Add Version 1.1 Milestone one docs to capture changes since version 1.0 was released. Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jakarta-struts/doc/release-notes-1.1-ms1.xml Index: release-n

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html ErrorsTag.java

2001-06-23 Thread rleland
rleland 01/06/23 20:36:10 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html Tag: STRUTS_1_0_BRANCH ErrorsTag.java Log: Buzilla 2198 This is a limited patch that doesn't add arguments to the errors tag, which is needed to fully cleanup er

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html ErrorsTag.java

2001-06-23 Thread rleland
rleland 01/06/23 20:33:10 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html ErrorsTag.java Log: Pretty up formatting. Revision ChangesPath 1.10 +10 -10 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html/ErrorsTag.java Index: ErrorsTag.java

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html ErrorsTag.java

2001-06-23 Thread rleland
rleland 01/06/23 20:22:55 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html ErrorsTag.java Log: Buzilla 2198 This is a limited patch that doesn't add arguments to the errors tag, which is needed to fully cleanup error reporting. Currently given:

Re: Struts 1.0 Released - Looking forward to 1.1!!!!!!!

2001-06-23 Thread Michael Mok
Hi Niall I have been using your extentions (being able to access and update indexed properties via the iterate tag) in my Web Timesheet system. Yes it would be really good if your changes are committed into the 1.1 release. Your code change is certainly not a waste of time for me. Otherwise if y

RE: Struts 1.0 Released - Looking forward to 1.1!!!!!!!

2001-06-23 Thread Niall Pemberton
Ted, I submitted a patch a month ago, following a go-ahead from Craig to a bugzilla I raised and it got zero response. Now maybe it wasn't any good and probably I should have put more explanation, but a response saying something would have been great. That was the reason I put the comment about

Re: Extending the scope of the struts validation

2001-06-23 Thread David Winterfeldt
I'm intersted in seeing the code too. If my validation framework does more, maybe we can make them work in tandem. I've actually been working on making the validation framework work independant of Struts. A friend of mine wants to be able to configure a different set of rules just to run on a

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/example/org/apache/struts/webapp/example ApplicationResources.properties

2001-06-23 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/06/23 10:51:35 Modified:src/example/org/apache/struts/webapp/example ApplicationResources.properties Log: Update version number in the page title. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/src/example/org/apache/struts/w

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/example/org/apache/struts/webapp/example ApplicationResources.properties

2001-06-23 Thread craigmcc
craigmcc01/06/23 10:50:38 Modified:src/example/org/apache/struts/webapp/example Tag: STRUTS_1_0_BRANCH ApplicationResources.properties Log: Grr, Forgot to update the version number in the example app. Submitted by: Dan Connelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> R

Re: Extending the scope of the struts validation

2001-06-23 Thread Ted Husted
Personally, I'm probably +1 on all of this, though it's hard to be sure until the code is on the table ;-) A very good approach, regardless of whether you want to offer it to Struts or to the Commons, is to setup a portal page someplace, as David, Oleg, and Cedric have done. You could always post

Re: Extending the scope of the struts validation

2001-06-23 Thread Ron Smith
That's great that your management supports open sourcing this code. Personally, I'd be very interested in seeing it. I had an immediate need for a transformations (data conversion) package (e.g. Date<->String, ArrayList -> Sorted ArrayList, ...), so I started work on one recently. I'm putting th

Extending the scope of the struts validation

2001-06-23 Thread Frangois Rey
You may remember some of my earlier postings about a mapper framework that we use as a validation framework. I now have the support in my company to make it open source. However, I first would prefer to: 1- Invite the community to realize that a validation framework, definitely required in Str

beware: beta remnants

2001-06-23 Thread Dan Connelly
I tried to replace the beta on my Tomcat with the 1.0, but that pesky beta just kept hanging around.  I must be so stupid.       jakarta-struts-1.0-src/src/example/org/apache/struts/webapp/example/ApplicationResources.properties:index.title=MailReader Demonstration Application (Struts 1.0-b1)

Can someone unsubscribe me

2001-06-23 Thread Prabha Desai
Title: Can someone unsubscribe me The automated version is not working. I have been trying for the past few months.