DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3959.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Whoops, missed this one.
We've recently discussed this over on the taglib and commons mail lists.
The end resolution was that an OS/Browser checker was better fitted as a
Bean that sits inside JSPTL than a custom tag library. So the next step is
to work on a Bean that can analyse a request.
It
[Cross-posted to Struts-Dev]
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2001 18:04:24 +0100 (BST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Log Reporting (was RE: Browser detection taglib)
This
+1
Sounds like a good way to give more visibility to all
the bugs.
David
--- Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Originally, I think we did that just to leverage
bugilla's automatic
mail feature. Posting them to DEV and leaving them
unassigned would seem
to be a better fit with the
martinc 01/10/04 22:07:48
Modified:doc struts-html.xml
src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html OptionTag.java
OptionsTag.java
Log:
Port fix for Bugzilla #3289 to main trunk.
PR: 3289
Submitted by: Joe Hrynyk
Revision Changes
