-Original Message-
From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: zaterdag 10 november 2001 11:59
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: Re: Hold the Phone!... Nesting Tags (including form items)
[...]
Again, in general, I would like to see the core Struts framework kept
I think Ted was just saying that the core of Struts
should remain small and that there can be lots of
add-ons and extensions for plug and play
functionality. It makes the core easier to manage and
then people can add in whatever functionality they
need by just dropping in a jar and/or tld. It
I am taking on the project of converting (with backwards compatibility) all
the struts-html tags to be XHTML-compliant.
I'd like to use this e-mail to tell you my approach, ask you for advice, and
get your feedback.
1. Approach:
In HtmlTag.java, add
if (xhtml)
On Sun, 11 Nov 2001, Matt Raible wrote:
Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2001 22:00:40 -0700
From: Matt Raible [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Converting struts-html tags to be XHTML-compliant
I am taking on the project of converting
I would think request scope would be better than pageContext so the
attribute will be available inside jsp:include or template/component
includes.
-Original Message-
From: Matt Raible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 12:01 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
Arron wrote:
Thanks for the support of the extension, but I think that Ted's comment
was from the question as to integrate the functionality into the
existing tags or to have an extra package with their own classes that
extend the original, and his opinion was that they should have their own
