Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.

2002-05-02 Thread Arron Bates
After some deep thought... (any HHGTTG fans out there? :) It all sounds quite ok as to what it is you're trying to do. I do think that an efficient routing of the link interaction through JavaScript is a good thing. It is a very viewy thing people want to do. Looking at it from the end

Re: Trouble with example from nightly build (and a solution)

2002-05-02 Thread Jean Fotovat
hello, my web.xml file already contains init-param param-nameapplication/param-name param-valueorg.apache.struts.webapp.example.ApplicationResources/param-va lue /init-param but the project does not run under jbuilder, until i remove the struts library from project properties. does it exist

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8732] New: - Fileupload with Bea Weblogic 6.1 Sp2 throws an exception

2002-05-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8732. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8733] New: - cancel and reset tag missin in nested tag library

2002-05-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8733. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8733] - cancel and reset tag missin in nested tag library

2002-05-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8733. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8733] - cancel and reset tag missin in nested tag library

2002-05-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8733. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

urgent:struts 1.1 and jsp ?.?

2002-05-02 Thread Jean Fotovat
hello community, which version of jsp should i use with struts 1.1 ? and where could i find such a version ? thank you jean fotovat

urgent : treeview...

2002-05-02 Thread Jean Fotovat
hello community, is there someone who has tested successfully the tree implementation sample on http://www.keyboardmonkey.com/pilotlight with tomcat 3.2.1, or better with jbuilder 5.

Re: treeview...

2002-05-02 Thread Jean Fotovat
hello arron, it does not seem to represent a sample on how to implement a treeview with struts !? isn't it ? thank you jean fotovat - Original Message - From: Arron Bates [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Struts Users Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

RE: urgent:struts 1.1 and jsp ?.?

2002-05-02 Thread Ken . Horn
Please ask on struts-user. Not very urgent either. -Original Message- From: Jean Fotovat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 May 2002 12:47 To: Struts Developers List Subject: urgent:struts 1.1 and jsp ?.? hello community, which version of jsp should i use with struts 1.1 ? and where

Re: treeview...

2002-05-02 Thread Arron Bates
It requires JSP 1.2 Apparently JSP 1.1 wont evaluate the custom tags of a dynamically included JSP. Which could also explain your servlet exception. Update your Tomcat to get it to work properly. You can fake it though, by looping through the child nodes yourself, but it will be restricted in

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 8742] New: - redisplay DynaActionForm in view

2002-05-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8742. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.

2002-05-02 Thread Phase Web and Multimedia
Arron, Let me preface this email with the understanding that I developed this about 2 months ago and am using it on a site now. So, I haven't thought about it for a while and so my memory of it might be presumptuous in some areas (sigh! I wish my mind were a computer). Notes are mingled with

Re: treeview...

2002-05-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Jean Fotovat wrote: Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 14:28:30 +0200 From: Jean Fotovat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: treeview... hello community, has somebody implements a treeview on struts framework ?

Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.

2002-05-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Interesting idea. But I'd really like to get 1.1 out the door before adding lots of new functionaltiy ... One of the things I learned, in watching the development of JSTL, is that tags with lots and lots of optional attributes, and different operating modes, can be really hard to understand --

Re: urgent:struts 1.1 and jsp ?.?

2002-05-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Jean Fotovat wrote: Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 13:46:59 +0200 From: Jean Fotovat [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: urgent:struts 1.1 and jsp ?.? hello community, which version of

Tiles/use of parameter in the components composition

2002-05-02 Thread @Basebeans.com
Subject: Tiles/use of parameter in the components composition From: PitBull [EMAIL PROTECTED] === Hi all, I have the following situation: %@ taglib uri=/WEB-INF/conf/tiles.tld prefix=tiles % tiles:insert page=/Layout.jsp flush=true tiles:put name=title value=My page / tiles:putList

OT: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.

2002-05-02 Thread @Basebeans.com
Subject: OT: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag. From: Jose Quinteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] === Phase Web and Multimedia wrote: After some deep thought... (any HHGTTG fans out there? :) What's HHGTTG not familiar with that one. :-) Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy. Deep thought

RE: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.

2002-05-02 Thread Phase Web and Multimedia
good point -Original Message- From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:52 AM To: Struts Developers List Subject: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag. Interesting idea. But I'd really like to get 1.1 out the door before adding

RE: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.

2002-05-02 Thread Tim Moore
+1 ;-) In general I'd say that any time you're thinking of having different modes of operations for a tag, you're probably better off just making another tag. -- Tim Moore / Blackboard Inc. / Software Engineer 1899 L Street, NW / 5th Floor / Washington, DC 20036 Phone 202-463-4860 ext. 258 /

Re: OT: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.

2002-05-02 Thread Arron Bates
Correct. :) Arron. Struts-dev Newsgroup (@Basebeans.com) wrote: Subject: OT: Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag. From: Jose Quinteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] === Phase Web and Multimedia wrote: After some deep thought... (any HHGTTG fans out there? :) What's HHGTTG not familiar with

Re: increased JavaScript support in the link tag.

2002-05-02 Thread Arron Bates
Interesting idea. But I'd really like to get 1.1 out the door before adding lots of new functionaltiy ... Not a problem. One of the things I learned, in watching the development of JSTL, is that tags with lots and lots of optional attributes, and different operating modes, can be really

Sorry : Confusion with Filter: please help

2002-05-02 Thread vivek shrivastava
Please disregrad this posting in stuts-dev mailing list. i am sorry for posting here. hi, I am trying to write my first web application. I am writing a filter to make sure that a valid user is logged in before accessing a page. I have a welcome page in application’s root directory. All