DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14082.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12473.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14042.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hello,
Is it possible to add a feature that can load messages from database.
All the message resources are in a text file, it is not easy to manage if there are so
many.
Best regards,
Eric
==
If you know what you are doing,
it is not called RESEARCH!
check it out at
http://www.mail-archive.com/struts-user;jakarta.apache.org/msg44742.html
Regards,
Adolfo.
From: Eric Chow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Eric Chow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ResourceProperties in database
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 17:30:18 +0800
Hello,
Is
Quite possible! And already done (custom) in our application, as well
as Jame's OJB implementation. His implementation is far more robust
than ours, but I just wanted to add our experience. It is actually
quite trivial to implement a custom MessageResources subclass to do this.
Erik
Eric
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14042.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
/show_bug.cgi?id=14042
Memory leaks with JBoss 3.x +(Tomcat/Jetty)
--- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2002-10-30 15:10 ---
Tried build 20021030 and found the same as before. I also saw execption
NoRouteToHostException 'cause some dtd resolver wants to connect to the
internet
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
+1 on your proposed approach, including not doing the deprecated
thing for
stuff that was added after 1.1b2.
Craig
Bugzilla, Please :-) !
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-unsubscribe;jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: mailto:struts-dev-help;jakarta.apache.org
Eddie and others - that change did the trick. I'm now back in business
with Cactus tests! Many thanks. I'll keep the issue open with the
Cactus folks and I very well could be doing something strange in my test
case configuration as well, but at least Struts is still happy and now
I'm happy!
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14092.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14092.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14094.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
At end.
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:craigmcc;apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 11:44 PM
David == David Karr Karr writes:
David Presently JSTL tags can't easily access
DynaActionForm objects. I haven't
David used these much, but I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14054.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On 30 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rename Application components to Module
It would probably be more convenient to have this conversation directly on
STRUTS-DEV while we hash out the details :-).
Regarding Rob's basic issue, it might be worthwhile to see how I treated
essentially the
So, this is a long-winded case of asking why can't we do this?
The method
public ApplicationConfig ActionConfig.getApplicationConfig()
though this is only used 4 times in struts itself, it is public.
Which means we assume that others extending struts may rely on it.
So to remain
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11932.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14092.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13574.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14107.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11932.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I understand the criteria to be included on the powered by page to be that
you either: 1. Put the powered by struts logo on a page or 2. include item
3 from the apache license on the page.
Have I missed anything? How many pages do you have to put the logo on?
Some of the sites listed need a
dgraham 2002/10/30 18:10:31
Modified:doc/resources powered.xml
Log:
added juliannegiffin.com
Revision ChangesPath
1.7 +1 -0 jakarta-struts/doc/resources/powered.xml
Index: powered.xml
===
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14107.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Guess not.
James Mitchell
Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
http://www.open-tools.org
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not
sure about the former.
- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
-Original Message-
From: James Mitchell
Most were posted before the criteria came into effect. It would be
good to clean house sometime, and then enforce the criteria
proactively.
-Ted.
10/30/2002 9:06:59 PM, David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I understand the criteria to be included on the powered by page
to be that
you
Why don't we remove the ones posted before the criteria? It seems like a
reasonable requirement to display the powered by logo to be listed on the
powered by page.
David
From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL
10/30/2002 1:29:38 PM, Robert Leland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, this is a long-winded case of asking why can't we do
this?
The method public ApplicationConfig
ActionConfig.getApplicationConfig()
though this is only used 4 times in struts itself, it is public.
Which means we assume that
10/30/2002 11:49:13 AM, Karr, David [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does anyone else want to chime in on this?
If you want to make the change, broadening the use of
DynaActionForms sounds like a worthwhile feature to me.
-Ted.
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I set aside some quality time on Sunday morning for volunteer
work, and so I might be able to put something together then
(unless Joe wants to step up again).
-Ted.
10/30/2002 9:23:30 PM, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Guess not.
James Mitchell
Software Engineer/Struts Evangelist
Yes, now that the deadline has passed, someone could do that.
10/30/2002 10:23:35 PM, David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Why don't we remove the ones posted before the criteria? It
seems like a
reasonable requirement to display the powered by logo to be
listed on the
powered by page.
I'm starting to work on source patches so I'm setting up my build
environment for testing purposes. I've found this exercise both mundane and
time consuming. Would it be worthwhile to post a zipped up build
environment with a build.properties that's ready to go? Getting all the
appropriate
I wholeheatedly agree. Just had to redo my
environment on a new machine.
+1.
-james
--- David Graham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm starting to work on source patches so I'm
setting up my build
environment for testing purposes. I've found this
exercise both mundane and
time consuming.
Ok, When I get this working I'll clean it up and we can decide where to post
it.
David
From: James Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Building Struts
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2002 19:40:21 -0800
David Graham wrote:
I understand the criteria to be included on the powered by page to be
that you either: 1. Put the powered by struts logo on a page or 2.
include item 3 from the apache license on the page.
I believe the criteria was not Struts specific.
Just that they mention the Apache
Ted Husted wrote:
10/30/2002 1:29:38 PM, Robert Leland wrote:
So, this is a long-winded case of asking why can't we do
this?
The method public ApplicationConfig
ActionConfig.getApplicationConfig()
though this is only used 4 times in struts itself, it is public.
Which means we assume that
Hi,
I wanted to know about the programmers manual and architecture document.
Additionally if there are documents on design etc on struts, it would
be great. I wanted to know if they are in place, where can I download them from.
Thanks.
Regards,
Rakesh
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
So, this is a long-winded case of asking why can't we do this?
* Move all the functionality of ApplicationConfig to ModuleConfig.
* Make ApplicaitonConfig a subclass of ModuleConfig with no
extra methods of its own.
* Deprecate the ApplicationConfig class itself.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14116.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
bugzilla == bugzilla [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
bugzilla DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
bugzilla RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
bugzilla http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14116.
bugzilla ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS
45 matches
Mail list logo
