DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15196] - Bug on the RequestUtils.computeParameters using a DynaValidatorForm as map of the parameter

2002-12-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15196. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15670] New: - Doc for exception element needs to mention page and exception in req. scope

2002-12-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15670. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15670] - Doc for exception element needs to mention page and exception in req. scope

2002-12-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15670. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

2002-12-26 Thread Martin Cooper
On Wed, 25 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote: 12/24/2002 6:53:29 PM, Martin Cooper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The plan doesn't say we're committing to fixing the problem, it says the problem report must be resolved before final release of Struts 1.1. I believe we need to do that, even if we have to

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

2002-12-26 Thread Ted Husted
Craig's message mentions an up to the minute list, which I believe should be a Bugzilla query. If something comes in just before the freeze, and it's not a true show stopper, we can just make it LATER, which we should be doing anyway. I would just like to get out of the habit of dual

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

2002-12-26 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote: Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2002 16:55:34 -0500 From: Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised) Craig's message

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15673] New: - Default Action in ActionMapping

2002-12-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15673. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

2002-12-26 Thread Ted Husted
Ok, I'll update the Roadmap and the B3 plan with the appropriate queries, and add a box next to the bugs we are swatting to indicate their status. This will at least make the static list easier to maintain =:0) Just finished setting a bunch of new equipment, and I'm quite ready to get back to

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15673] - Default Action in ActionMapping

2002-12-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15673. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 15673] - Default Action in ActionMapping

2002-12-26 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15673. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc status.xml

2002-12-26 Thread husted
husted 2002/12/26 17:49:41 Modified:doc status.xml Log: Add link from Roadmap to 1.1b3 proposal. Add Bugzilla links to proposal. Mark items that have already been resolved yeah!/. Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +25 -29jakarta-struts/doc/status.xml Index:

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/proposals release-plan-1.1b3.xml

2002-12-26 Thread husted
husted 2002/12/26 17:49:54 Modified:doc/proposals release-plan-1.1b3.xml Log: Add link from Roadmap to 1.1b3 proposal. Add Bugzilla links to proposal. Mark items that have already been resolved yeah!/. Revision ChangesPath 1.4 +52 -22

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/proposals release-plan-1.1b3.xml

2002-12-26 Thread husted
husted 2002/12/26 17:53:59 Modified:doc/proposals release-plan-1.1b3.xml Log: Insert #13645 to b3 bug list, as discussed. Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +7 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/proposals/release-plan-1.1b3.xml Index: release-plan-1.1b3.xml

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/struts-el README.txt

2002-12-26 Thread dmkarr
dmkarr 2002/12/26 18:23:52 Modified:contrib/struts-el README.txt Log: Removed present and notPresent from the list of tags in the logic library that were NOT ported to struts-el. I forgot to remove them from this list after I implemented them later (because I realized the

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide index.xml

2002-12-26 Thread husted
husted 2002/12/26 18:38:43 Modified:doc/userGuide index.xml Log: Update index with current section numbers. Revision ChangesPath 1.24 +4 -2 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/index.xml Index: index.xml

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

2002-12-26 Thread Martin Cooper
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Ted Husted wrote: Ok, I'll update the Roadmap and the B3 plan with the appropriate queries, and add a box next to the bugs we are swatting to indicate their status. This will at least make the static list easier to maintain =:0) I just updated the site with your

Re: [VOTE] Struts 1.1 Beta 3 Release Plan (revised)

2002-12-26 Thread Eddie Bush
I don't really think we need a revote, but if others do you can count in my +1. At this stage, I'm all for marking new bugs as LATER for the next release (whether that be a beta or final). By all means, let's try to knock out the bugs we can between now and the time the beta is cut, but