Re: xhtml javascript hiding methods

On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, David Graham wrote: > Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 23:35:27 -0700 > From: David Graham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: xhtml javascript hiding methods > > Well, here are the choices as I understand them:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16159] New: - tag in XHTML mode should include alt=""

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

xhtml javascript hiding methods

Well, here are the choices as I understand them: 1. Use CDATA to hide the javascript and make it completely useless in current browsers. 2. Use a comment to hide the javascript which allows current browsers to work and xml parsers. The xhtml spec does suggest using CDATA but I don't see a re

Re: cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/htmlJavascriptValidatorTag.java

On 16 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Date: 16 Jan 2003 03:55:09 - > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: cvs commit: > jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html > JavascriptValidatorTag.jav

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html JavascriptValidatorTag.java

dgraham 2003/01/15 19:55:09 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html JavascriptValidatorTag.java Log: Removed generation of CDATA section for xhtml. Using html comments works better. Revision ChangesPath 1.20 +4 -11 jakarta-st

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html XhtmlTag.java

dgraham 2003/01/15 19:51:23 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html XhtmlTag.java Log: Added apache license to top of file, not sure about the keyword replacement though. Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +61 -0 jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/tag

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16153] - error reported with new versons

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16153] New: - error reported with new versons

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16148] - Missing link for source distribution 1.1 b3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16148] New: - Missing link for source distribution 1.1 b3

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16128] - Exception on FormTag deploying on EASERVER 3.6.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16128] - Exception on FormTag deploying on EASERVER 3.6.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16128] - Exception on FormTag deploying on EASERVER 3.6.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16128] - Exception on FormTag deploying on EASERVER 3.6.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16128] New: - Exception on FormTag deploying on EASERVER 3.6.1

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16117] New: - Html Link tag

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

Re: Requested modification of InsertTag.java

This make sense. I will do it asap. Can you report an "enhancement request" so that I remind it. Thanks, cedric Jay wrote: Requested modification of tiles/InsertTag.java I appreciate your ExceptionHandler concept and use it for capturing critical errors, thoroughly logging both

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16066] - Newbie FAQ - How can I prepopulate a form

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16065] - Newbie FAQ - Do I have a separate ActionForm bean for every HTML form

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16063] - Newbie FAQ - do ActionForms have to be true JavaBeans?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16108] New: - Newbie FAQ - Why is ActionForm a base class rather than an interface?

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16107] New: - Configure if you want to call ActionForm.reset() in element in struts-config.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 16104] New: - default handler parameter value for LookupDispatchAction

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/contrib/scaffold/src/java/org/apache/struts/scaffold ProcessFormAction.java ProcessDispatchAction.java ProcessAction.java

husted 2003/01/15 02:19:26 Modified:contrib/scaffold/src/java/org/apache/struts/scaffold ProcessFormAction.java ProcessDispatchAction.java ProcessAction.java Log: + Add response parameter to CheckOutcome and friends. Revision Cha