Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Mete Kural wrote:
--///--
The best way to get involved would be to check out CVS sources for both
jakarta-struts and jakarta-commons-sandbox, become familiar with the code
referenced above, and start making suggestions and improvements. A really
Ted Husted wrote:
I working on something similar right now too, but using the FormProc
package. I believe that we should represent entire input form in XML,
including things like the default control type and field labels, and so
forth, along with prompts, error messages, validations, and type
The browsers universally accept HTML documents as output over HTTP, but
they do not input HTML or XML, but a simple list of parameters. We've
been experimenting with transforming that list into JavaBeans, and I'm
not sure that the experiment has succeeded. It made writing tags more
convenient
+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
Ted Husted wrote:
The browsers universally accept HTML documents as output over HTTP, but
they do not input HTML or XML, but a simple list of parameters. We've
been experimenting with transforming that list into JavaBeans, and I'm
not sure that the experiment has succeeded. It made writing tags
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22912.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22467.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23020.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
dgraham 2003/09/21 18:39:19
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/taglib/html MessagesTag.java
Log:
doAfterBody() treats missing message keys the same as
doStartTag(). If the message is null, it's removed from the
PageContext, else it's set as usual. This finishes the fix
for
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23005.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22971.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
dgraham 2003/09/21 18:50:01
Modified:web/example/WEB-INF validation.xml
Log:
Removed unsupported bundle attribute for PR# 16272.
Revision ChangesPath
1.9 +2 -3 jakarta-struts/web/example/WEB-INF/validation.xml
Index: validation.xml
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17368.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22700.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Sorry to confuse you, Peter. Apparently, I'm not being clear.
FormProc is a SourceForge project http://formproc.sourceforge.net/.
It's a mature library that is used by the JPublish Framework and
distributed under the Apache License. It is designed to capture a list
of parameters, validate
husted 2003/09/21 21:00:22
Modified:contrib/struts-chain/src/java/org/apache/struts/chain/legacy
CatalogConfiguratorPlugIn.java
Log:
JavaDoc fix.
Revision ChangesPath
1.4 +4 -4
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Peter A. Pilgrim wrote:
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:15:38 +0100
From: Peter A. Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Where is Struts 2 going?
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
On
On Sun, 21 Sep 2003, Peter A. Pilgrim wrote:
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 11:22:12 +0100
From: Peter A. Pilgrim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Where is Struts 2 going?
Ted Husted wrote:
I working on
19 matches
Mail list logo
