DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14183] - html:img does not support forward attribute

2003-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14183. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 14183] - html:img does not support forward attribute

2003-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14183. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Raising feature requests and fix suggestions - What's the acceptedway.

2003-10-02 Thread Richard Tomlinson
As others have mentioned, Bugzilla is the best way to raise enhancement requests (and post corresponding patches), while the STRUTS-DEV list is the best place to discuss ideas. I'll follow this route, thanks. With regard to reload, you're going to find yourself disappointed when

Re: [Vote] Choosing a build/doc gen tool(s) [was: Re: The Forrest Option]

2003-10-02 Thread Robert Leland
James Mitchell wrote: I thought that one of the Forrest Committters said that the Forrest plug-in for Maven is most likely broken ? Most of us have given (or at least hinted at) our opinions, so let's give a show of hands: Mavenization: [X] +1 - I am in favor of using Maven for

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23573] New: - struts-blank webapp will not reload

2003-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23573. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23573] - struts-blank webapp will not reload

2003-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23573. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23574] New: - FileUploadException: Processing of multipart/form-data request failed. Read timed out

2003-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23574. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23573] - struts-blank webapp will not reload

2003-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23573. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23574] - FileUploadException: Processing of multipart/form-data request failed. Read timed out

2003-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23574. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23573] - struts-blank webapp will not reload

2003-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23573. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Action Wrappers. 2nd Request for Comments Code Contribution

2003-10-02 Thread Hubert Rabago
I'm new to the DEV list so please let me know if I'm going about this the wrong way. I've read the introduction on the website, https://www.sistemas-jasper.com/indexStrutsActionWrappers.htm, and I think this extension will be useful for some applications, although those I've worked on the past

Re: Action Wrappers. 2nd Request for Comments Code Contribution

2003-10-02 Thread Sgarlata Matt
Hi, I'm not a committer either, but I've been lurking on this list a bit and have learned a thing or two. Your plug-in is a very frequently requested feature, but it definitely looks a lot like what is called action chaining, which is not considered a Struts best practice. You can search the

Re: Action Wrappers. 2nd Request for Comments Code Contribution

2003-10-02 Thread Joe Germuska
At 12:32 -0400 10/2/03, Sgarlata Matt wrote: Your plug-in is a very frequently requested feature, but it definitely looks a lot like what is called action chaining, which is not considered a Struts best practice. You can search the mail archives for more information. As a quick summary, action

Re: [Vote] Choosing a build/doc gen tool(s) [was: Re: The Forrest Option]

2003-10-02 Thread Don Brown
It might be broken, but then again, we aren't using Maven today anyways. I asked him about it, and he said last he heard it was working, some people reported it buggy, but since no one was using it, it was staying in jira until someone could put time into it. If we moved to Forrest, I would

Re: [Vote] Choosing a build/doc gen tool(s) [was: Re: The Forrest Option]

2003-10-02 Thread Ted Husted
Steve Raeburn wrote: I'd like to add Maven now, learn from the experience on 1.x and then use that to optimize the project organization and build process for version 2. If the people voting +1 are ready to roll up their collective sleeves and give Maven a try, then that would be fine with me.

RE: [Vote] Choosing a build/doc gen tool(s) [was: Re: The Forrest Option]

2003-10-02 Thread Steve Raeburn
Well Rob has already made a start on adding Maven. I did try building with it, but hit a snag downloading the validator jar and I've not had a chance to have another look since. I wouldn't have a problem with releasing based on a Maven RC because it's not a run-time dependency. Having said that I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23580] New: - how to read uploaded FormFile InputStream multiple times?

2003-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23580. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [struts-chain] Writing a command to process a Tiles Definition

2003-10-02 Thread Jing Zhou
- Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:24 AM Subject: Re: [struts-chain] Writing a command to process a Tiles Definition There's a conditional behavior use case in the existing

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23580] - how to read uploaded FormFile InputStream multiple times?

2003-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23580. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23583] New: - Support for an ActionForm factory

2003-10-02 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23583. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [struts-chain] Writing a command to process a Tiles Definition

2003-10-02 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Jing Zhou wrote: - Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Struts Developers List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 11:24 AM Subject: Re: [struts-chain] Writing a command to process a Tiles Definition There's a conditional behavior use

RE: [struts-chain] Writing a command to process a Tiles Definition

2003-10-02 Thread Andrew Hill
snip Didn't your O-O programming classes explain to you the evils of the goto statement? :-) /snip Of course everyone knows gotos are naughty. Thats why programming languages nowdays market them under the much friendlier sounding terms break and continue. ;- -Original Message- From: