DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23972.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23972.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
I'm sorry to bring back up a discussion that's been hashed out already,
but there's something I still don't understand...
I can see why it's better for every command in the chain to be executed
rather than executing a sub-chain based on some condition. I can see
the correlation of the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Greg Reddin wrote:
I'm sorry to bring back up a discussion that's been hashed out
already, but there's something I still don't understand...
I can see why it's better for every command in the chain to be
executed rather than executing a sub-chain based on some condition.
I can see the
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23465.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21906.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Greg Reddin wrote:
If this is the case, how are we any better off with this model than we
were with a monolithic request processor? Why should the commands have
so much inter-dependence now that they are separate objects? Are we
better off with them as inter-dependent separate objects than we
Joe Germuska wrote:
See Ted's recent post copied in below... I'm definitely going to look
at Chain before I invest a lot of energy in a PageController that works
as earlier discussions have gone.
So, just to report back. I tried using view Command in place of view
action. It worked fairly well
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21906.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This has been the source of many nights of frustration for me.
The problem appears to be with Cactus.
Here's what I'm doing:
Windows XP Pro
JDK 1.4.1_02
Cactus 13-1.4.1
and a brand spanking new cvs checkout
As I am typing this, I am remote debugging Jboss/Tomcat and with a
11 matches
Mail list logo