DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23972] - illegal character with struts-validator.war

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23972. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23972] - illegal character with struts-validator.war

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23972. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

[chain] conditionals again

2003-10-22 Thread Greg Reddin
I'm sorry to bring back up a discussion that's been hashed out already, but there's something I still don't understand... I can see why it's better for every command in the chain to be executed rather than executing a sub-chain based on some condition. I can see the correlation of the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 24021] New: - parsing exception fails to report which file being parsed....

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24021. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [chain] conditionals again

2003-10-22 Thread Craig R. McClanahan
Greg Reddin wrote: I'm sorry to bring back up a discussion that's been hashed out already, but there's something I still don't understand... I can see why it's better for every command in the chain to be executed rather than executing a sub-chain based on some condition. I can see the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23465] - indexed form data cannot be parsed by a struts DynaActionForm bean

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23465. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21906] - IncludeTagTest fails under TC 4.1, TestErrorsTag1 fails under TC 3.3

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21906. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: [chain] conditionals again

2003-10-22 Thread Ted Husted
Greg Reddin wrote: If this is the case, how are we any better off with this model than we were with a monolithic request processor? Why should the commands have so much inter-dependence now that they are separate objects? Are we better off with them as inter-dependent separate objects than we

Re: Reviving PageController (ViewController?) discussion?

2003-10-22 Thread Ted Husted
Joe Germuska wrote: See Ted's recent post copied in below... I'm definitely going to look at Chain before I invest a lot of energy in a PageController that works as earlier discussions have gone. So, just to report back. I tried using view Command in place of view action. It worked fairly well

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21906] - IncludeTagTest fails under TC 4.1, TestErrorsTag1 fails under TC 3.3

2003-10-22 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21906. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 21906] - IncludeTagTest fails under TC 4.1, TestErrorsTag1 fails under TC 3.3

2003-10-22 Thread James Mitchell
This has been the source of many nights of frustration for me. The problem appears to be with Cactus. Here's what I'm doing: Windows XP Pro JDK 1.4.1_02 Cactus 13-1.4.1 and a brand spanking new cvs checkout As I am typing this, I am remote debugging Jboss/Tomcat and with a