Re: Test Case Exception Throwing style (Re: Cactus tests)

Quoting Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > > > James Mitchell wrote: > > > So, for now I just commented out those few lines and now the tests pass > > > completely under tomcat 4.0, but under 4.1 it fails randomly with: > > > > Personally, I am in favor

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/reports project.xml index.xml file-activity-report.xml dependencies.xml cvs-usage.xml changelog-report.xml

husted 2003/12/11 19:32:26 Removed: doc/reports project.xml index.xml file-activity-report.xml dependencies.xml cvs-usage.xml changelog-report.xml Log: Remove experimental files; we can wait for Maven to include these. ---

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide building_controller.xml configuration.xml installation.xml introduction.xml release-notes.xml

husted 2003/12/11 19:20:53 Modified:doc project.xml status.xml doc/userGuide building_controller.xml configuration.xml installation.xml introduction.xml release-notes.xml Log: Minor tweaks. Revision ChangesPath 1.44 +0 -4

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc learning.xml

husted 2003/12/11 16:07:46 Modified:doc learning.xml Log: Gramar fixes. Revision ChangesPath 1.18 +3 -3 jakarta-struts/doc/learning.xml Index: learning.xml === RCS file: /home/cvs/jak

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide building_controller.xml

husted 2003/12/11 12:38:12 Modified:doc/userGuide building_controller.xml Log: Update for 1.2.x series. Revision ChangesPath 1.72 +1 -1 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/building_controller.xml Index: building_controller.xml ==

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide dev_validator.xml

husted 2003/12/11 12:37:47 Modified:doc/userGuide dev_validator.xml Log: Update for 1.2.x series. Revision ChangesPath 1.38 +78 -124 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/dev_validator.xml Index: dev_validator.xml

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide release-notes.xml

husted 2003/12/11 12:37:26 Modified:doc/userGuide release-notes.xml Log: Through today. Revision ChangesPath 1.42 +18 -20jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/release-notes.xml Index: release-notes.xml ==

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide release-notes.xml

husted 2003/12/11 12:24:54 Modified:doc/userGuide release-notes.xml Log: Through today. Revision ChangesPath 1.41 +39 -31jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/release-notes.xml Index: release-notes.xml ==

cvs commit: jakarta-struts project.properties

husted 2003/12/11 12:24:17 Modified:.project.properties Log: Change back to 30 day window Revision ChangesPath 1.5 +2 -2 jakarta-struts/project.properties Index: project.properties

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/xdocs/stylesheets struts.css

sraeburn2003/12/11 12:18:59 Added: xdocs/stylesheets struts.css Log: Add missing css stylesheet Revision ChangesPath 1.1 jakarta-struts/xdocs/stylesheets/struts.css Index: struts.css ===

cvs commit: jakarta-struts struts.jsl

sraeburn2003/12/11 12:08:07 Modified:.struts.jsl Log: Fix additional whitespace problems occurring in sections Revision ChangesPath 1.2 +4 -9 jakarta-struts/struts.jsl Index: struts.jsl ===

Re: Test Case Exception Throwing style (Re: Cactus tests)

Martin Cooper wrote: I'd be +0 on dropping Tomcat 4.0 testing. However, we might want to start testing against Tomcat 5.0, now that a stable release is available: http://jakarta.apache.org/site/news.html#20031203.1 If the policy is that Struts 1.x supports 2.2/1.2 and later, then I suppose we shou

Re: Test Case Exception Throwing style (Re: Cactus tests)

Essentially, it would remove the need to "click-thru" the example applications by hand. These are "UI" tests directly against the HTML pages. Typically, these types of tests are delicate, but WebTest is scripted with a XML file, so in practice they are relatively easy to maintain. Martin Coope

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25451] - and should support arrays

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25451] New: - logic:empty (EmptyTag) and logic:notEmpty (NotEmptyTag) don't support arrays

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide release-notes.xml

husted 2003/12/11 09:54:31 Modified:doc/userGuide release-notes.xml Log: Through September. Revision ChangesPath 1.40 +189 -57 jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/release-notes.xml Index: release-notes.xml ==

Re: Test Case Exception Throwing style (Re: Cactus tests)

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > Personally, I could live with running with Cactus tests just against > TC4.1, so long as we were still testing the sample applications under > TC3.3 before a release. > > When I get the release notes caught up, I'm planning to do a suite of > Canoo Webtests

Re: Test Case Exception Throwing style (Re: Cactus tests)

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003, Ted Husted wrote: > James Mitchell wrote: > > So, for now I just commented out those few lines and now the tests pass > > completely under tomcat 4.0, but under 4.1 it fails randomly with: > > Personally, I am in favor of dropping the tests for TC4.0 and only > testing against

Re: Test Case Exception Throwing style (Re: Cactus tests)

Personally, I could live with running with Cactus tests just against TC4.1, so long as we were still testing the sample applications under TC3.3 before a release. When I get the release notes caught up, I'm planning to do a suite of Canoo Webtests for the example applications, which will be eas

Re: Test Case Exception Throwing style (Re: Cactus tests)

To clarify my own statement: the cactus tests in maven run using the Tomcat installed in the location defined in "build.properties" under the property name "tomcat.home.41" The Maven cactus plugin doesn't seem to support Tomcat 3. I guess we could work those ant tasks into the maven.xml file m

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide release-notes.xml

husted 2003/12/11 04:26:09 Modified:doc/userGuide release-notes.xml Log: Start "What's New" section. Revision ChangesPath 1.39 +78 -61jakarta-struts/doc/userGuide/release-notes.xml Index: release-notes.xml =

Re: Test Case Exception Throwing style (Re: Cactus tests)

James Mitchell wrote: So, for now I just commented out those few lines and now the tests pass completely under tomcat 4.0, but under 4.1 it fails randomly with: Personally, I am in favor of dropping the tests for TC4.0 and only testing against Tomcat 3.3 and Tomcat 4.1, which are the reigning Ref

Re: Tutorial and configuration file DTD mismatch?

The problem is that the Struts Mailreader Example does some things just to show people how they would be done if they needed to do them for some good reason. The big fix would be to get back to work on the Struts Examples (plural) application that could demonstrate these type of techniques with

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 25434] New: - multipart/form-data loses all request parameters in action forward.

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT . ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE. http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bu