DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23255] - FormFile.getFileName() problem in multibyte character file name

2004-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23255. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 23255] - FormFile.getFileName() problem in multibyte character file name

2004-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23255. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Does struts-chain work with tomcat 4.1 ?

2004-01-20 Thread Patrick Chanezon
Hi all, I started working on struts-chain in order to add support for portlets. I built struts-chain from cvs, using a nightly struts 1.2 build jakarta-struts-20040113.zip to bootstrap my build, and my own build of commons-chain from CVS. I used the struts-example application from the nightly

Re: Does struts-chain work with tomcat 4.1 ?

2004-01-20 Thread Patrick Chanezon
Forget about question 3, and the exception. It seems like the struts-config.xml file for the struts-chain does not contain the welcome actionforward definition. diff -U 3 /Users/pat/java/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/webapps/struts-chain/WEB-INF/struts-config.xml

Re: [18111] et al

2004-01-20 Thread Joe Germuska
At 11:37 PM -0500 1/19/04, Ted Husted wrote: In reference to http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18111 which I also gathered under http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25855. The suggestion is to add contextRelative to rewrite, as we just did for img. The usecase

Re: Does struts-chain work with tomcat 4.1 ?

2004-01-20 Thread Joe Germuska
My other questions still stand. 1. is someone actively working on that code right now ? 2. does someone have struts-chain installed and configured correctly ? from where did you get it ? Any caveats for the build ? 4. I used maven to build struts: the maven dist target's result differs

Re: Does struts-chain work with tomcat 4.1 ?

2004-01-20 Thread BaTien Duong
Patrick Chanezon wrote: Forget about question 3, and the exception. It seems like the struts-config.xml file for the struts-chain does not contain the welcome actionforward definition. diff -U 3 /Users/pat/java/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/webapps/struts-chain/WEB-INF/struts-config.xml

Re: [18111] et al

2004-01-20 Thread Martin Cooper
Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] At 11:37 PM -0500 1/19/04, Ted Husted wrote: In reference to http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18111 which I also gathered under http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25855. The

Compartmentalization of Modules (was Re: [18111] et al)

2004-01-20 Thread Joe Germuska
I can't think of any reason to block direct links between modules; I can't speak for others, but our use cases for modules turn out to be much less strictly segregated than was apparently the intent of the original design, given how complicated certain things turn out to be. The original

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26291] New: - Page navigation fails with client side state management

2004-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26291. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

RE: Compartmentalization of Modules (was Re: [18111] et al)

2004-01-20 Thread Edgar P Dollin
If the use of modules is truly to split struts-config.xml files, then isn't it simpler to just use comma delimited configuration files in web.xml? Edgar -Original Message- From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 3:02 PM To: Struts Developers List

RE: Compartmentalization of Modules (was Re: [18111] et al)

2004-01-20 Thread Joe Germuska
At 3:30 PM -0500 1/20/04, Edgar P Dollin wrote: If the use of modules is truly to split struts-config.xml files, then isn't it simpler to just use comma delimited configuration files in web.xml? Well... yes. Some times you just do things the way you've always done them until someone points out a

RE: Compartmentalization of Modules (was Re: [18111] et al)

2004-01-20 Thread Ted Husted
Like James, I've been counseling teams to go multiple struts-configs rather than modules, because of the issues with cross-linking and sharing resources between modules. If we go ahead with the patch to html:link, to match the other changes we made this week, then I wouldn't have to steer

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26302] - WebLogic HTTPSession Replication problem

2004-01-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26302. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Compartmentalization of Modules (was Re: [18111] et al)

2004-01-20 Thread Robert Leland
Joe Germuska wrote: At 3:30 PM -0500 1/20/04, Edgar P Dollin wrote: If the use of modules is truly to split struts-config.xml files, then isn't it simpler to just use comma delimited configuration files in web.xml? Well... yes. Some times you just do things the way you've always done them

cvs commit: jakarta-struts/src/share/org/apache/struts/upload CommonsMultipartRequestHandler.java

2004-01-20 Thread husted
husted 2004/01/20 19:53:49 Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/upload CommonsMultipartRequestHandler.java Log: Apply #23255 FormFile.getFileName() problem in multibyte character file name submitted by YOKOTA Takehiko. Revision ChangesPath 1.13

Re: Compartmentalization of Modules (was Re: [18111] et al)

2004-01-20 Thread Robert Leland
Ted Husted wrote: Like James, I've been counseling teams to go multiple struts-configs rather than modules, because of the issues with cross-linking and sharing resources between modules. If we go ahead with the patch to html:link, to match the other changes we made this week, then I wouldn't