DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23255.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23255.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Hi all,
I started working on struts-chain in order to add support for portlets.
I built struts-chain from cvs, using a nightly struts 1.2 build
jakarta-struts-20040113.zip to bootstrap my build, and my own build of
commons-chain from CVS.
I used the struts-example application from the nightly
Forget about question 3, and the exception.
It seems like the struts-config.xml file for the struts-chain does not
contain the welcome actionforward definition.
diff -U 3
/Users/pat/java/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/webapps/struts-chain/WEB-INF/struts-config.xml
At 11:37 PM -0500 1/19/04, Ted Husted wrote:
In reference to
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18111
which I also gathered under
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25855.
The suggestion is to add contextRelative to rewrite, as we just
did for img. The usecase
My other questions still stand.
1. is someone actively working on that code right now ?
2. does someone have struts-chain installed and configured correctly ?
from where did you get it ? Any caveats for the build ?
4. I used maven to build struts: the maven dist target's result differs
Patrick Chanezon wrote:
Forget about question 3, and the exception.
It seems like the struts-config.xml file for the struts-chain does not
contain the welcome actionforward definition.
diff -U 3
/Users/pat/java/jakarta-tomcat-4.1.29/webapps/struts-chain/WEB-INF/struts-config.xml
Joe Germuska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 11:37 PM -0500 1/19/04, Ted Husted wrote:
In reference to
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18111
which I also gathered under
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25855.
The
I can't think of any reason to block direct links between modules; I
can't speak for others, but our use cases for modules turn out to be
much less strictly segregated than was apparently the intent of the
original design, given how complicated certain things turn out to be.
The original
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26291.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
If the use of modules is truly to split struts-config.xml files, then isn't
it simpler to just use comma delimited configuration files in web.xml?
Edgar
-Original Message-
From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 20, 2004 3:02 PM
To: Struts Developers List
At 3:30 PM -0500 1/20/04, Edgar P Dollin wrote:
If the use of modules is truly to split struts-config.xml files, then isn't
it simpler to just use comma delimited configuration files in web.xml?
Well... yes. Some times you just do things the way you've always
done them until someone points out a
Like James, I've been counseling teams to go multiple struts-configs rather than
modules, because of the issues with cross-linking and sharing resources between
modules.
If we go ahead with the patch to html:link, to match the other changes we made this
week, then I wouldn't have to steer
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26302.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 3:30 PM -0500 1/20/04, Edgar P Dollin wrote:
If the use of modules is truly to split struts-config.xml files, then
isn't
it simpler to just use comma delimited configuration files in web.xml?
Well... yes. Some times you just do things the way you've always done
them
husted 2004/01/20 19:53:49
Modified:src/share/org/apache/struts/upload
CommonsMultipartRequestHandler.java
Log:
Apply #23255 FormFile.getFileName() problem in multibyte character file name
submitted by YOKOTA Takehiko.
Revision ChangesPath
1.13
Ted Husted wrote:
Like James, I've been counseling teams to go multiple struts-configs rather than modules, because of the issues with cross-linking and sharing resources between modules.
If we go ahead with the patch to html:link, to match the other changes we made this week, then I wouldn't
17 matches
Mail list logo