DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26639.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17667.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26643.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Right now, if you accidentally enter a bogus form name in the
html:javascript tag, it omits the wrapping script tags, but prints
all the javascript anyway.
This doesn't seem right, but for some reason I have a feeling that
the solutions I'm thinking of are a bit contentious, so rather than
I'm not sure if struts itself has a design philosophy, but java itself
has the fail fast philosophy. Iterators are one of the most widely
cited examples. If something is wrong you want to fail as quickly as
possible. A developer should be made aware of the mistake. Leaving a
comment is
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26647.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
This looks like fun.
I originally thought it said html:image instead of html:img . I
noticed that html:image does not have height and width. When I look
at my HTML Pocket Reference, I see only align, src and name listed for
input type=image..., but from testing I know that height and width
Quoting Paul Sundling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I originally thought it said html:image instead of html:img . I
noticed that html:image does not have height and width. When I look
at my HTML Pocket Reference, I see only align, src and name listed for
input type=image..., but from testing I know
-Original Message-
From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Right now, if you accidentally enter a
bogus form name in the
html:javascript tag, it omits the wrapping script tags, but prints
all the javascript anyway.
This doesn't seem right, but for some reason I have a
At 1:36 PM +1300 2/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Paul Sundling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I originally thought it said html:image instead of html:img . I
noticed that html:image does not have height and width. When I look
at my HTML Pocket Reference, I see only align, src and name listed for
At 1:55 AM + 2/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am all for in-your-face. Tapestry has sort of a built in debugging web
page that gives all sorts of stats, on your running web app. The
least we can do is Blow up in a loud usefull way.
Alright, then; based on your input and Paul's, I'll make it
Is there any reason we can't delete:
struts-config_1_0.dtd -- Users should upgrade to at least Struts 1_1 dtd
tiles-config.dtd -- This is for pre struts tiles.
validation_1_1.dtd -- This moved to commons-validator pre struts 1.1
validator-rules_1_1.dtd -- This moved to
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason we can't delete:
struts-config_1_0.dtd -- Users should upgrade to at least Struts 1_1
dtd
tiles-config.dtd -- This is for pre struts tiles.
validation_1_1.dtd -- This moved to commons-validator pre struts
1.1
David Graham wrote:
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason we can't delete:
struts-config_1_0.dtd -- Users should upgrade to at least Struts 1_1
dtd
tiles-config.dtd -- This is for pre struts tiles.
validation_1_1.dtd -- This moved to
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 1:36 PM +1300 2/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Paul Sundling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I originally thought it said html:image instead of html:img . I
noticed that html:image does not have height and width. When I look
at my HTML Pocket Reference, I see only align,
On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any reason we can't delete:
struts-config_1_0.dtd -- Users should upgrade to at least Struts 1_1 dtd
Yes, they should, but we still support config files with the 1.0 format.
Are you suggesting we remove that support? I'm not so sure I'd
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Paul Sundling wrote:
Joe Germuska wrote:
At 1:36 PM +1300 2/4/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Paul Sundling [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I originally thought it said html:image instead of html:img . I
noticed that html:image does not have height and width. When I
19 matches
Mail list logo
