Re: Counting down to the 1.2.1 release (was RE: Making Struts Build Easier)

2004-03-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Otherwise, we'll need to roll back the JavaScriptTag.java and validator-rules.xml in struts to use validator 1.1.1. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Counting down to the 1.2.1 release (was RE: Making Struts Build Easier)

2004-03-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- Ted Husted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 09:03:46 -0700, Matt Raible wrote: > > >> -Original Message----- > > >> From: Ted Husted [m

Re: URL validation - anyone using it?

2004-03-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
r expression thats used. I would apply any patches that were submitted -Rob ----- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project

2004-03-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since Craig indicated his preference NOT to be VP, how does this impact this proposal ? -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Broken interface: forwardURL(HttpServletRequest, ForwardConfig)

2004-03-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A Compatable method was just and will be in the nightly build for March 12th. -Rob > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > That was definatly a mistake. It was made between version > 1.145 & 1.146 of the file (Which was the very last CV

Re: Broken interface: forwardURL(HttpServletRequest, ForwardConfig)

2004-03-11 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
lto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, March 11, 2004 06:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Broken interface: forwardURL(HttpServletRequest, ForwardConfig) > > Hi guys, > > I am a Apache Velocity-Tools developer and I just noticed you have removed > the forwardURL(HttpSer

Struts nightly build now needs Validator-1.1.2-dev

2004-03-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
1.1.1. -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: ASL 2.0

2004-03-07 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An alternative is to directly run the python scripts, it's probably easier than applying the patch. I could do that. > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2004 10:08 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' &g

Re: [VOTE] Struts as an Apache Top Level Project

2004-03-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 for Struts TLP & +1 for Craig as VP > -Original Message- > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TranZ NetworkZ - Received Your Mail

2004-03-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Customer, We Will Get Back To You Shortly. Regards, Suresh (91) 080-23561956 (91) 044-24838112 Bangalore - India - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TranZ NetworkZ - Received Your Mail

2004-03-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Customer, We Will Get Back To You Shortly. Regards, Suresh (91) 080-23561956 (91) 044-24838112 Bangalore - India - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

TranZ NetworkZ - Received Your Mail

2004-03-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dear Customer, We Will Get Back To You Shortly. Regards, Suresh (91) 080-23561956 (91) 044-24838112 Bangalore - India - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Maven Build (Re: Struts Change Tracking)

2004-03-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Thank you. > > The current build does generate the Mavenized web site when you run > Just a reminder: the xdocs directory should not be maintained - the live I synced the xdocs to docs about a

Re: Maven Build (Re: Struts Change Tracking)

2004-03-02 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: Steve Raeburn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I think I committed anything I had a while ago. So the demo website that you posted should be able to generated using the current build ? Also you mentioned that you had a script to automatically move over th

Re: Maven Build (Re: Struts Change Tracking)

2004-02-27 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It was Steve R. that said he would committ changes after 1.2.0. > -Original Message- > From: Tim Chen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I can help with the maven build. I had some patches for the maven build > way back when that were incorporated and have learned quite a bit m

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 27235] -

2004-02-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comments such as you made are helpful, since few of us are experts on everything, and we welcome advice and input. -Rob > -Original Message- > From: Richard Bywater [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 12:43 AM > To: 'Struts Developers List'

Re: Bug in JavascriptValidatorTag

2004-02-24 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Original Message- > From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2004 02:03 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: Re: Bug in JavascriptValidatorTag > > Hm. No one brought that up when we were talking about implementing > the

Re: 1.2.0 is tagged and frozen

2004-02-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
releases. Step #0 is required becasue we are part of Jakarta Step #1, #2, #3 is what httpd uses. (I had typed this up earlier but my email timed out, gurr!) > -Original Message- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 05:42 PM >

Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan

2004-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be sure to put the CVS TAGS in the refernce license.txt so it will add them automatically, at least the python version was ok with that. -Rob > -Original Message- > From: Paul Sundling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 11:27 PM > To: 'Strut

Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan

2004-02-21 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, February 21, 2004 12:46 AM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: RE: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan > > Does this involve changing the file header comment to replace the

Re: Status of struts-examples

2004-02-20 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> If there aren't any strong objections, > then, I'd like to remove them and make a clean break with the things we did for the > sake of the 1

Re: userguide logic:lessEqual error

2004-02-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
huge, but thought I'd point it out. > > Matt --------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Status of struts-examples

2004-02-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It would be nice(-0) to keep these around for a while longer, unless we are worried about bandwidth and want to encourage users to use the docs in the distro. > -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 01:24 AM >

Re: html:text disable attribute invalid.

2004-02-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
After looking at the DTD again I see I was mistakend when it said not available in this context, ie disabled, I was thinking the attribute instead of the control. -Rob > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I must be missing something. What in

html:text disable attribute invalid.

2004-02-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
it ? -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: DO NOT REPLY [Bug 26942] - Parse error using for in struts-cfg.xml

2004-02-14 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > We should remove the type and > other deprecated attributes from the DTD before releasing 1.2.0. +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMA

Re: deprecate org.apache.struts.taglib.html.ErrorsTag?

2004-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
by changing method signatures from to ActionMessages as opposed to ActionErrors. We'll need to create new methhods of course. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Browser-specific attrs for html tags (was: [Bug 26795])

2004-02-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: Karr, David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I've always been sympathetic to the goal of enforcing the HTML standard, > particularly for "internet" applications, as opposed to "intranet" > applications. However, when it com

Summary: Clean Up conf/share

2004-02-05 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
be, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Clean Up conf/share

2004-02-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: Martin Cooper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, February 4, 2004 04:24 AM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: Re: Clean Up conf/share > > On Wed, 4 Feb 2004, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Is ther

Clean Up conf/share

2004-02-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
moved to commons-validator pre struts 1.1 web-app_2_2.dtd <-- Don't know why we carry around web-app dtd's web-app_2_3.dtd -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: html:javascript behavior when form is not found

2004-02-03 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Right now, if you accidentally enter a > bogus form name in the > html:javascript tag, it omits the wrapping

Re: Deprecated: ActionError

2004-01-13 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
orrect > operation." > > > why not in all? > > it would be fine, to know this ;-) > > greetings > > Matthias > > > Matthias Weßendorf > Email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: Running Struts Cactus tests with Ant

2004-01-06 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message- > From: tomcatlist user [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2004 04:20 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: Re: Running Struts Cactus tests with Ant > > When I invoke maven, it complains about not finding com

Re: Struts EL Distro

2003-12-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
if we did that. We could create another ant target that never assembles the war files in the first place, and another 'ant demo-war' command could package the already compiled *.class files of the app into a war. -Rob > -Original Message- > From: David Graham [mailto:

Re: Struts 2.0 Discussion Forum

2003-12-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 09:22 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: Re: Struts 2.0 Discussion Forum > > Don Brown wrote: > > Is there one? I have several ideas I'd

Re: Struts 2.0 Ideas (was Re: Struts 2.0 Discussion Forum)

2003-12-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ctionForm implementation class they possibly could. ----- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan

2003-12-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ght. -Rob - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[Validator] was Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan

2003-12-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ig R. McClanahan> Quoting Martin Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > The issue isn't so much with voting on the relesae plan, but voting on the > > release itself. As you say, the HTTPD rules say that anyone can create a > > release. We're not HTTPD, though, and th

Re: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan

2003-12-16 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 > -Original Message- > From: Ted Husted [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 05:48 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: [VOTE] 1.2.0 Release Plan > > I've amended the date on the (now venerable) 1.2.0 release p

Re: Test Case Exception Throwing style (Re: Cactus tests)

2003-12-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ssing with 1.3. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Test Case Exception Throwing style (Re: Cactus tests)

2003-12-08 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Comments in line. > -Original Message- > From: Joe Germuska [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, December 8, 2003 09:56 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: Test Case Exception Throwing style (Re: Cactus tests) > I would suggest that the proper b

Re: Should Validator use a .js file script?

2003-11-30 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a struts-user question, it will be answered there. > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 28, 2003 07:27 PM > To: 'Struts Developers List' > Subject: Should Validator use a .js file script? >

Fwd: Declared Exceptions and Chained Exceptions

2002-12-27 Thread Matt Raible &lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I didn't get a response from the User List - so maybe one of you gents will know the answer. Thanks, Matt --- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], "Matt Raible" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Can I use Declarative Exceptions and Chained Exceptions at the same time? I'd love to be a

struts and pdf files

2002-09-30 Thread FALL Mamadou - NTR ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
Hi everyone, I have a pb with struts and pdf files; when I try to load a pdf file troughout an action , it doesn't load !? Anyone knows how to deal with it? Mamadou FALL -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

sureone

2002-09-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
my ActionForm have multiType properties, i found its property can't be set correctly except "string" type. can someone help me. thanks ! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

sureone

2002-09-10 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i found if the form's method is "post",then the Action can't forward to a servlet! -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Struts Layout problem

2002-03-11 Thread GALLAPONT Jean-Remy - SOP ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
help Jean-Rémy GALLAPONT SchlumbergerSema Ingénieur chargé d'études Tel: 04.97.15.79.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 150, Allée Pierre Ziller - Les Bouillides BP279 - 06905 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex Fax: 04.94.15.89.01 -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EM

Struts runtime failure on Weblogic 5.1Sp8 (in custom tag 'message')

2002-02-18 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- L'e-mail gratuit pas comme les autres. Pour créer votre adresse : http://www.nomade.fr/courrier/ouvrir.asp NOMADE.FR, pourquoi chercher ailleurs ? -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>