Niall,
Your approach is simpler. However, I believe a lot of legacy code would
break if that kind of change were to be made. I think a separate property
name is warranted here.
- jeff
- Original Message -
From: Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
-
From: Jeff Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 20 June 2001 14:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Struts 1.0 Released - Looking forward to 1.1!!!
Niall,
Your approach is simpler. However, I believe a lot of legacy code would
break if that kind of change were
Sorry to hear that. Guess your not too happy with the 76ers right about
now...
;-
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 12:21 PM
Subject: Re: WhoWeAre
Mike, I'm from Lower merion and I went to Penn. My cousin is an
Craig,
I'm a strong believer in backward compatibility. Therefore, my vote is no
since it will potentially have potential side affects.
- jeff
- Original Message -
From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 4:42 PM
Subject: Calling
this approach would seem to need is a way to specify that you're
forwarding to a path that is relative to cobrandX, rather than
baseJSPdir, right?
Craig McClanahan
On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Jeff Trent wrote:
I haven't heard much in the way of a reponse on this proposal so I guess
I'll be on my own
- Original Message -
From:
Jeff
Trent
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ted Husted
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:21
AM
Subject: Proposal
New here ... so bare with me.
I'd like to propose the following enhancement to
ActionForm:
public void
addListener
Ok. I guess I'm not familiar enough with struts yet to see how to apply
this type of logic dynamically to the action mapping. I certainly *don't*
want to assign these mappings in the .XML file if that is what you are
suggesting. I do see some sense in extending the ActionMapping class to do
New here ... so bare with me.
I'd like to propose the following enhancement to
ActionForm:
public void
addListener(ActionFormListener);
public void
removeListener(ActionFormListener);
Here is the basics of ActionFormListener I'm
interested in to start out with:
public abstract class
0:53
AM
Subject: Re: Proposal
Is it possible to do anything from a servlet
after a forward, i.e., I don't think the POST_RENDERED concept will work if
struts is using a forward.
Taylor Cowan
- Original Message -
From:
Jeff
Trent
To: [EMAIL PROTECTE
ng from a servlet
after a forward, i.e., I don't think the POST_RENDERED concept will work
if struts is using a forward.
Taylor Cowan
- Original Message -
From:
Jeff
Trent
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Interesting - sounds like its modeled after Group of 4, Decorator Pattern...
These event listeners - are they passive or do they muck with the result
stream?
-jeff
- Original Message -
From: Christian Cryder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:37
essage -
From:
Jeff Trent
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Ted
Husted
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001
9:21 AM
Subject: Proposal
New here ..
12 matches
Mail list logo