Re: Struts 1.0 Released - Looking forward to 1.1!!!!!!!

2001-06-20 Thread Jeff Trent
Niall, Your approach is simpler. However, I believe a lot of legacy code would break if that kind of change were to be made. I think a separate property name is warranted here. - jeff - Original Message - From: Niall Pemberton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday,

Re: Struts 1.0 Released - Looking forward to 1.1!!!!!!!

2001-06-20 Thread Jeff Trent
- From: Jeff Trent [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 20 June 2001 14:09 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Struts 1.0 Released - Looking forward to 1.1!!! Niall, Your approach is simpler. However, I believe a lot of legacy code would break if that kind of change were

Re: WhoWeAre

2001-06-14 Thread Jeff Trent
Sorry to hear that. Guess your not too happy with the 76ers right about now... ;- - Original Message - From: Jonathan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 12:21 PM Subject: Re: WhoWeAre Mike, I'm from Lower merion and I went to Penn. My cousin is an

Re: Calling ActionForm.reset() from html:form when creating a bean

2001-06-13 Thread Jeff Trent
Craig, I'm a strong believer in backward compatibility. Therefore, my vote is no since it will potentially have potential side affects. - jeff - Original Message - From: Craig R. McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2001 4:42 PM Subject: Calling

Re: Proposal

2001-06-12 Thread Jeff Trent
this approach would seem to need is a way to specify that you're forwarding to a path that is relative to cobrandX, rather than baseJSPdir, right? Craig McClanahan On Mon, 11 Jun 2001, Jeff Trent wrote: I haven't heard much in the way of a reponse on this proposal so I guess I'll be on my own

Re: Proposal

2001-06-11 Thread Jeff Trent
- Original Message - From: Jeff Trent To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ted Husted Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 10:21 AM Subject: Proposal New here ... so bare with me. I'd like to propose the following enhancement to ActionForm: public void addListener

Re: Proposal

2001-06-11 Thread Jeff Trent
Ok. I guess I'm not familiar enough with struts yet to see how to apply this type of logic dynamically to the action mapping. I certainly *don't* want to assign these mappings in the .XML file if that is what you are suggesting. I do see some sense in extending the ActionMapping class to do

Proposal

2001-06-06 Thread Jeff Trent
New here ... so bare with me. I'd like to propose the following enhancement to ActionForm: public void addListener(ActionFormListener); public void removeListener(ActionFormListener); Here is the basics of ActionFormListener I'm interested in to start out with: public abstract class

Re: Proposal

2001-06-06 Thread Jeff Trent
0:53 AM Subject: Re: Proposal Is it possible to do anything from a servlet after a forward, i.e., I don't think the POST_RENDERED concept will work if struts is using a forward. Taylor Cowan - Original Message - From: Jeff Trent To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: Proposal

2001-06-06 Thread Jeff Trent
ng from a servlet after a forward, i.e., I don't think the POST_RENDERED concept will work if struts is using a forward. Taylor Cowan - Original Message - From: Jeff Trent To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Work flow RFC

2001-06-06 Thread Jeff Trent
Interesting - sounds like its modeled after Group of 4, Decorator Pattern... These event listeners - are they passive or do they muck with the result stream? -jeff - Original Message - From: Christian Cryder [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:37

Re: Proposal

2001-06-06 Thread Jeff Trent
essage - From: Jeff Trent To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Ted Husted Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 9:21 AM Subject: Proposal New here ..