On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Vic Cekvenich wrote:
> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2003 18:30:09 -0400
> From: Vic Cekvenich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: Struts Developers List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [BeanUtils] Interesting Microbenchmarks
>
ssage-
From: Kurt Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 4:35 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: [BeanUtils] Interesting Microbenchmarks
Brendan
I'm kind of on a low budget here and so I'm using NetBeans which as far
as I
can tell, doesn't have any pr
riginal Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 7:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [BeanUtils] Interesting Microbenchmarks
Kurt,
Why don't you hit that thing with a profiler?
When I hist a large number of log
PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 5:23 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: [BeanUtils] Interesting Microbenchmarks
It would be more interesting if you ran the tests on the latest Tomcat
production build because of the *large* JSP performance improvements
between the 4.0.x and 4.1.x
---
From: Kurt Post [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 2:47 PM
To: Struts Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [BeanUtils] Interesting Microbenchmarks
But doesn't the big speed improvement of switching from html:checkbox to
html:messages kind of eliminate the tomc
I think jPetStore is using DynaBeans and that is what they saw -
Reflection time.
I myself do not use DynaBeans (or think they are a good idea for a few
other reasons, like unit testing and reuse).
.V
Craig R. McClanahan wrote:
The most important factor in page rendering time (which is not
t 04, 2003 5:23 PM
To: Struts Developers List
Subject: RE: [BeanUtils] Interesting Microbenchmarks
It would be more interesting if you ran the tests on the latest Tomcat
production build because of the *large* JSP performance improvements
between the 4.0.x and 4.1.x series.
David
--- Kurt Po
The most important factor in page rendering time (which is not the same as
the CPU consumption being discussed on the ServerSide thread) is the
quality of the JSP page compiler. Tomcat 4.0.6 (your platform) uses the
original version of Jasper, whereas the current generation (4.1.27 and
5.0.6) uses
en the third test page (with html:messages tags on it was almost
> twice
> as slow. The last test page which just contained no struts tags except
> for
> html:form and html:submit still took from 0 to 10 milliseconds but I
> thick
> this was just due to limitations in accuracy of
ystem timer.
Test Environment
Intel P4 2.8 GHZ 512MB
Window XP
JDK 1.4.1.4.1_04-b01
Tomcat 4.0.6 running under NetBeans 3.5 (normal execution, not debug)
Struts 1.1
Kurt
-Original Message-
From: Craig R. McClanahan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2003
TheServerSide (www.theserverside.com) recently published a case study that
attempted to analyze the performance characteristics of a variety of
middleware configurations, including two J2EE app servers and Microsoft's
.NET platform. One of the hot spots that showed up in the Java based
figures was
11 matches
Mail list logo
